2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-020-09743-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Clickstream Analyses and Graph-Modeled Data Clustering for Identifying Common Response Processes

Abstract: Complex interactive test items are becoming more widely used in assessments. Being computer-administered, assessments using interactive items allow logging time-stamped action sequences. These sequences pose a rich source of information that may facilitate investigating how examinees approach an item and arrive at their given response. There is a rich body of research leveraging action sequence data for investigating examinees’ behavior. However, the associated timing data have been considered mainly on the it… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that partially and fully correct action sequences are more similar to each other and thus can be collapsed into one group. Following Ulitzsch et al (2021a), actions that are not essential to successfully solve the task were recoded by aggregate-level categories (e.g., “responding to an email,” “seeking help,” “keystrokes,” “creating new folder,” “using the toolbar,” “opening folders”). In addition, email and folder identifiers were dropped.…”
Section: Data and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that partially and fully correct action sequences are more similar to each other and thus can be collapsed into one group. Following Ulitzsch et al (2021a), actions that are not essential to successfully solve the task were recoded by aggregate-level categories (e.g., “responding to an email,” “seeking help,” “keystrokes,” “creating new folder,” “using the toolbar,” “opening folders”). In addition, email and folder identifiers were dropped.…”
Section: Data and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For disentangling incorrect behavioral patterns, we drew on an exploratory two-step approach that was proposed in Ulitzsch et al (2021a). This hybrid method combines data mining techniques originally developed for the analysis of clickstream data (see Banerjee & Ghosh, 2001) with graph-modeled data clustering for identifying common and dominant behavioral patterns.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Sahin and Colvin (2020) suggested to combine information on the time spent on task with information on the number of performed actions to classify responses as rapid, disengaged responses. Ulitzsch, He, and Pohl (2021) proposed using sequence mining techniques by combining action sequences and time intervals between actions to understand the incorrect behavioural patterns on interactive tasks. It would be interesting to leverage these observable variables with the latent states and transitions from the HMM application in the future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though item developers and content experts could pre‐define optimal strategies that are the most efficient ways to solve the tasks, the strategies may not be exclusively recorded in advance (He et al, 2019). Also, there are always unpredictable behaviour patterns in the incorrect response group (Ulitzsch et al, 2021; Ulitzsch, He, & Pohl, 2021). Second, process data are generally noisy, highly variable, and hard to perceive (Tang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, recently researchers proposed different models for response time and the joint modeling of responses and response time (e.g., Bolsinova and Molenaar ; Costa et al ; Wang et al ). In addition, other process data such as the path collected based on eye-tracking devices (e.g., Zhu and Feng, 2015 ; Maddox et al, 2018 ; Man and Harring, 2021 ), action sequences in problem-solving tasks (e.g., Chen et al ; Tang et al, 2020 ; He et al, 2021 ; Ulitzsch et al, 2021b ), and processes in collaborative problem solving (e.g., Graesser et al, 2018 ; Andrews-Todd and Kerr, 2019 ; De Boeck and Scalise, 2019 ), are also worthy of exploration and integration with product data for assessment purposes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%