2013
DOI: 10.22323/2.12030203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining citizen science and public engagement: the Open AirLaboratories Programme

Abstract: Citizen Science (or "Public Participation in Scientific Research")

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also important is ensuring diversity and inclusion among citizen science participants to encourage broad participation that may foster in-depth scientific learning-by-doing (Bela et al 2016). Practitioners also must understand the range of scientific outcomes that can be communicated to different audiences (Riesch et al 2013), and they should increase and improve collaborations among citizen scientists and professional scientists, across disciplines, to enhance the reach, innovation, and impact of citizen science projects ). In addition, the benefits and impacts of public participation in science will be better measured and understood when projects label themselves under the umbrella term of citizen science.…”
Section: Demonstrate Scientific Benefits Of Citizen Science: Creatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also important is ensuring diversity and inclusion among citizen science participants to encourage broad participation that may foster in-depth scientific learning-by-doing (Bela et al 2016). Practitioners also must understand the range of scientific outcomes that can be communicated to different audiences (Riesch et al 2013), and they should increase and improve collaborations among citizen scientists and professional scientists, across disciplines, to enhance the reach, innovation, and impact of citizen science projects ). In addition, the benefits and impacts of public participation in science will be better measured and understood when projects label themselves under the umbrella term of citizen science.…”
Section: Demonstrate Scientific Benefits Of Citizen Science: Creatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore re-assessed the requirements for usable data and shifted our focus from public engagement to collaboration with an outdoor science school on the third year, effectively trading spatial coverage for usable temporal resolution. This tradeoff between breadth and depth has been previous identified as a potential difficulty facing researchers who delve into citizen science [Riesch, Potter and Davies, 2013].…”
Section: Objective and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of scientist's engagement in Citizen Science, Golumbic et al (2017) suggest three characteristics revealed by the researchers themselves and the current literature in the form of inclusion, contribution and reciprocality. This definition seems to be in close relation to Lewenstein's original theory of the participation and engagement of non-scientists and scientists, including the decision-making and democratic processes (Lewenstein, 2004, p. 1), but with regard to the aspects of reciprocality Golumbic et al (2017) include dissemination of scientific information to the public as potentially valuable, as it can serve as an important factor in science communication and in raising Public Understanding of Science (Bonney et al, 2016;Golumbic et al, 2017, p. 3;Riesch, Potter, & Davies, 2013) as well as Public Engagement of Science (Brossard & Lewenstein, 2009). As AHF includes an external media partner, this dimension seems particularly relevant for that project.…”
Section: The Field Of Citizen Sciencementioning
confidence: 96%