2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining association rules mining with complex networks to monitor coupled risks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the different nature and value range of data, it is difficult to classify the risk level, so the data is firstly normalized. That is, the value after processing is reserved between [0, 1] [ 50 ]. Firstly, the discrete variables of two-state and three-state were transformed into continuous variables by means of expert rating.…”
Section: Safety Risk Coupling Analysis Methods Of Prefabricated Building Hoistingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the different nature and value range of data, it is difficult to classify the risk level, so the data is firstly normalized. That is, the value after processing is reserved between [0, 1] [ 50 ]. Firstly, the discrete variables of two-state and three-state were transformed into continuous variables by means of expert rating.…”
Section: Safety Risk Coupling Analysis Methods Of Prefabricated Building Hoistingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the selection of different thresholds of minimum confidence and minimum support, the number of association rules is shown in Figure 7 . Extreme cases such as “0.1–0.1” and “1–1” will cause significant errors when selecting parameters, and it should be selected from a gentle stage [ 50 ]. In this case, the parameter can be selected as .…”
Section: Safety Risk Coupling Analysis Methods Of Prefabricated Building Hoistingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Reliability modeling In the reliability modeling step, the traditional PRA method including the Event Tree (ET) [29,30] and the Fault Tree (FT) [31,32] methods are improved by incorporating complex network theory [33][34][35][36] to describe the risk propagation features. Based on the risk definition, identification and features analysis, the configuration reliability model can be built using the PRPA method.…”
Section: Framework Of Space Station Configuration Reliability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B is the consequent. ARM has three important indicators (Zhou et al, 2019), including support, confidence and lift. More specifically, support is the percentage of the entire dataset covered by the rule, confidence measures the reliability of the inference of a generated rule, and lift is a measure of the interdependence of the antecedent and consequent in the rule.…”
Section: Highway Construction Accidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars have introduced quantitative methods into the accident analysis process, and ARM is one of these methods. The development of safety monitoring systems facilitates access to data in construction process (Zhou et al, 2019). The improvement of the accident reporting system also provides a source of accident information (Shao et al, 2019).…”
Section: Highway Construction Accidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%