2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Ability and Heterosis Studies for Grain Yield and Its Components in Hybrids of Quality Protein Maize (Zea mays L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…is is in contrast with the findings of Arsode et al [28] who reported significant negative association of days to 50% tasseling with grain yield per plant and plant height, ear length, ear girth, number of kernel-rows per ear, and number of kernels per row.…”
Section: Path Coefficient Analysescontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is is in contrast with the findings of Arsode et al [28] who reported significant negative association of days to 50% tasseling with grain yield per plant and plant height, ear length, ear girth, number of kernel-rows per ear, and number of kernels per row.…”
Section: Path Coefficient Analysescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…is implies that higher ear height leads to increased grain yield; the genotypic correlation between ear height and grain yield (rg � 0.698; p ≤ 0.01) is predominately attributed to the direct effect (rg � 0.651; p ≤ 0.01) of ear height on the grain yield per hectare (Figure 1). Many research findings were in line with this finding [12,28,29]. Similarly, it is also in agreement with the findings of Asrarur-Rehman et al [23] and Bello et al [24].…”
Section: Path Coefficient Analysessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding ear length, only L15 x T1 cross showed positive and significant standard heterosis over Kolba. Shushay (2014) and Arsode et al (2017) for number of ears per plant, Raghu et al (2011) and Asif et al (2014) for ear length found comparable results to the current findings. Though ear diameter revealed significantly positive and negative standard heterosis, none of the crosses had wider ear diameter than the best standard checks (Kolba).…”
Section: Standard Heterosissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The variation due to SCA effects was also significant for the studied traits, except for the total soluble solids content, indicating that non-additive gene action (domination and epistasis) was involved in the trait's inheritance (Table 6). In the development of improved cultivar, the estimation of SCA effects serves helpful information on both parental forms (maternal and paternal) used in the individual cross combination (Arsode et al 2017). Unfortunately, in the present populations, most of the hybrids had non-significant SCA effects or significant, but in the undesired direction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%