2018 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iscc.2018.8538525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining ABCD Rule, Texture Features and Transfer Learning in Automatic Diagnosis of Melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For experimentation, our method overall results are significantly better than the previously reported works as 90% [15], 92.1% [16], 67% [22], 90.69% [23], 87.25% [24], 86.21% [33], and 89.0% [34] are some studies that are compared with the proposed framework. The proposed study, significantly achieves better accuracy results as shown in Tab.…”
Section: Comparison Of Proposed Studymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For experimentation, our method overall results are significantly better than the previously reported works as 90% [15], 92.1% [16], 67% [22], 90.69% [23], 87.25% [24], 86.21% [33], and 89.0% [34] are some studies that are compared with the proposed framework. The proposed study, significantly achieves better accuracy results as shown in Tab.…”
Section: Comparison Of Proposed Studymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The ABCD rule and texture features are combined to provide an automatic diagnosis of melanoma cancer. In this study, a computational method using dermoscopic images is developed to help dermatologists differentiate between non-melanoma and melanoma skin lesions [16]. A novel approach is introduced to identify melanoma using the ABCD rule based on mobile devices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By incorporating a feature selection approach and by combining both CNN features and other handcrafted descriptors, the authors improve their results achieving a value of 98% accuracy. Also, an accuracy of 97.5% is obtained in [24][25] by using handcrafted features, 96.5% accuracy by fusing handcrafted and deep-learning-based features in [26], while feature extraction from pre-trained models achieves 93% in [27].…”
Section: 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 𝑇𝑃/(𝑇𝑃+𝐹𝑃)+𝑇𝑁/(𝑇𝑁+𝐹𝑁)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They applied ABCD rule for extracte of features. GLCM was used as texture descriptor with division of features for GLCM [40].…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%