“…Today, four decades after these influential developments, QM/MM methods are regarded as one of the most influential approaches for the description of challenging chemical phenomena. Initially conceived in the framework of biomolecular simulations (Friesner and Guallar, 2005 ; Hu and Yang, 2009 ; van der Kamp and Mulholland, 2013 ; de Visser et al, 2014 ; Cui, 2016 ; Lu et al, 2016 ; Quesne et al, 2016 ), the range of QM/MM methods has been substantially extended to include other areas accessing inter alia solid-state chemistry and material science (Gonis and Garland, 1977 ; Krüger and Rösch, 1994 ; Stefanovich and Truong, 1996 ; Jacob et al, 2001 ; Herschend et al, 2004 ; Keal et al, 2011 ; Bjornsson and Bühl, 2012 ; Golze et al, 2013 , 2015 ; Hofer and Tirler, 2015 ) and solution chemistry (Staib and Borgis, 1995 ; Tuñón et al, 1995 , 1996 ; Gao, 1996 ; Hofer et al, 2010 , 2011 , 2012 ; Weiss and Hofer, 2012 ; Hofer, 2014 ) as well. These QM/MM studies have given insight into how Nature works, and, for instance, explain regio- and stereochemical selectivities during substrate activation (Faponle et al, 2016 , 2017 ; Timmins et al, 2017 ).…”