2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined XPS / TEM study of the chemical composition and structure of the passive film formed on additive manufactured 17-4PH stainless steel

Abstract: Combined XPS / TEM study of the chemical composition and structure of the passive film formed on additive manufactured 17-4PH stainless steel. (2021) Surfaces and Interfaces, 22. 100874.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those higher capacitance values for the conventional samples led to thickness values δ that were lower as compared to LBM samples. This result was in agreement with our previous results obtained by using both XPS and TEM [24]. Slight differences were noticeable, however, between the three sets of δ values: 3.9 and 4.4 nm from XPS calculations, 2.4 ± 0.1 nm and 3.0 ± 0.1 nm from TEM measurements [24] and ~ 1.1 nm and ~ 1.3 nm from EIS data fitting for conventional and LBM MSSs, respectively (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Those higher capacitance values for the conventional samples led to thickness values δ that were lower as compared to LBM samples. This result was in agreement with our previous results obtained by using both XPS and TEM [24]. Slight differences were noticeable, however, between the three sets of δ values: 3.9 and 4.4 nm from XPS calculations, 2.4 ± 0.1 nm and 3.0 ± 0.1 nm from TEM measurements [24] and ~ 1.1 nm and ~ 1.3 nm from EIS data fitting for conventional and LBM MSSs, respectively (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This result was in agreement with our previous results obtained by using both XPS and TEM [24]. Slight differences were noticeable, however, between the three sets of δ values: 3.9 and 4.4 nm from XPS calculations, 2.4 ± 0.1 nm and 3.0 ± 0.1 nm from TEM measurements [24] and ~ 1.1 nm and ~ 1.3 nm from EIS data fitting for conventional and LBM MSSs, respectively (Table 2). The values given here from EIS data fitting are mean values calculated from the three δ values given in Table 2 for both LBM and conventional samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations