2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1763-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined use of serum (1,3)-β-d-glucan and procalcitonin for the early differential diagnosis between candidaemia and bacteraemia in intensive care units

Abstract: BackgroundThis study aimed to assess the combined performance of serum (1,3)-β-d-glucan (BDG) and procalcitonin (PCT) for the differential diagnosis between candidaemia and bacteraemia in three intensive care units (ICUs) in two large teaching hospitals in Italy.MethodsFrom June 2014 to December 2015, all adult patients admitted to the ICU who had a culture-proven candidaemia or bacteraemia, as well as BDG and PCT measured closely to the time of the index culture, were included in the study. The diagnostic per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
63
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This will hopefully be associated with the following most appreciated side effects: (1) primary cost savings (e.g., due to the waiving of expensive antifungal drugs and reduced hospital and ICU stay) and (2) reducing drug resistance rates (with secondary cost savings). Although the combined use of BDG and PCT was recently described to be suitable for early differential diagnosis between candidemia and bacteremia in intensive care units [22], the diagnostic value of BDG for IFI diagnosis is not free of doubts and subject of controversial discussions [37][38][39][40]. In line with that, BDG recently failed to be a suitable biomarker for reliable IFI diagnosis in septic shock within the presented cohort [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This will hopefully be associated with the following most appreciated side effects: (1) primary cost savings (e.g., due to the waiving of expensive antifungal drugs and reduced hospital and ICU stay) and (2) reducing drug resistance rates (with secondary cost savings). Although the combined use of BDG and PCT was recently described to be suitable for early differential diagnosis between candidemia and bacteremia in intensive care units [22], the diagnostic value of BDG for IFI diagnosis is not free of doubts and subject of controversial discussions [37][38][39][40]. In line with that, BDG recently failed to be a suitable biomarker for reliable IFI diagnosis in septic shock within the presented cohort [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Common diagnostic procedures for the identification of patients suffering from an IFI (such as culture-based diagnostics or plasma levels of β-D-glucan (BDG)) are associated with relevant weaknesses, so that a considerable number of IFI cases might be missed [20][21][22]. Moreover, this diagnostic insufficiency is associated with a delayed initiation of antifungal therapy, associated with the abovementioned increased mortality rates [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical diagnosis of IFI mainly consisted of four parts: host factors (preventive treatment), clinical characteristics (empirical treatment), microbiological examination (preemptive treatment) and histopathology (pathogen treatment) [7]. Histopathological examination was the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of IFI, but as an invasive examination, it had been restricted in clinical practice [10]. Compared with the time-consuming and low detection rate of fungal culture [11], as a unique microbiological detection method for fungal infection [12], G test had the advantages of being specific, fast and accurate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevated levels of (1-3)-β-D-glucan in blood and other sterile body fluids indicated IFI, most commonly caused by aspergillus and candida. Therefore, G test [(1-3)-β-D-glucan assay] in the blood of patients can be used as an early predictor of IFI [10,15,16]. In this study, when positive fungal culture was used as the criterion for the diagnosis of IFI, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of G test for the diagnosis of IFI were 87.04%, 79.25%, 63.09% and 93.75%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] Possible alternative diagnostic algorithms for ICU patients have been proposed. [11][12][13][14][15][16] We report here the steps we will implement to develop a standard set of definitions for IFD in critically ill patients in ICU, starting from a systematic assessment of the strengths and limitations of the definitions and algorithms already available in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%