2014
DOI: 10.3390/rs6076163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Use of Multi-Temporal Optical and Radar Satellite Images for Grassland Monitoring

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of optical images, SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) images and the combination of both types of data to discriminate between grasslands and crops in agricultural areas where cloud cover is very high most of the time, which restricts the use of visible and near-infrared satellite data. We compared the performances of variables extracted from four optical and five SAR satellite images with high/very high spatial resolutions acquired during the growing season. A veget… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to later acquisition dates on which the investigation was performed (Lussem, 2016), because in mid-March to early April grassland and cereals bear a very similar structure and size. Until the heading stage of cereals a good discrimination of grassland and cereals cannot be obtained with a C-band Sensor (Dusseux et al, 2014). Particularly interesting is the good performance of MLC for grassland, since the SVM approach shows higher errors of omission and commission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to later acquisition dates on which the investigation was performed (Lussem, 2016), because in mid-March to early April grassland and cereals bear a very similar structure and size. Until the heading stage of cereals a good discrimination of grassland and cereals cannot be obtained with a C-band Sensor (Dusseux et al, 2014). Particularly interesting is the good performance of MLC for grassland, since the SVM approach shows higher errors of omission and commission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the temporal density of the time series improves jointly with its consistency, finer vegetation changes could be exploited to improve the classification. One could also consider to increase the density of the time series by combining optical data with radar (such as in [80] and [4]), which would be particularly useful in cloud-prone areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the complementarity of data from both optical and radar sensors for the characterization of LUCC has been put to use in many very recent studies, e.g., [42][43][44][45][46][47], the development of adequate data fusion techniques is an important ongoing field of research [48]. In general, fusion refers to a formal concept for combining data from different sources [49,50], with the aim of generating information of "greater quality" than the individual input datasets.…”
Section: Land Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, data from a number of past and current spaceborne SAR systems-Spaceborne Imaging Radar-C/X-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SIR-C/X-SAR), European Remote Sensing (ERS-1 and -2), Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR), Japanese Earth Resources Satellite (JERS-1), RADARSAT-1 and -2, Advanced Land Observation Satellite (ALOS-1)-are commonly in use and applied at regional-scales, with very few studies addressing global-scale mapping, e.g., [73]. Studies have covered a variety of themes related to land cover, including improved land cover classifications [35,74], forest cover classifications [75], grassland monitoring [47], identification of degraded woodlands [27,76,77] and mapping deforestation [78] and successional forest dynamics [11]. Similarly, land use-specific studies have focussed on various themes, including urban land use analysis [79,80], classification of agricultural areas [81], mapping and monitoring specific crop types (e.g., rice [82][83][84]), etc.…”
Section: Radar Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%