2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(11)60095-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Use of FSR Sensor Array and SVM Classifier for Finger Motion Recognition Based on Pressure Distribution Map

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in pressure changes observable between the surface of the forearm skin and the socket. This pressure pattern may be used as the primary information source for prosthetic control [22][23][24][25][26]. The hypothesis is that the pressure patterns generated by various hand motions are distinct enough to differentiate the various motions from each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This results in pressure changes observable between the surface of the forearm skin and the socket. This pressure pattern may be used as the primary information source for prosthetic control [22][23][24][25][26]. The hypothesis is that the pressure patterns generated by various hand motions are distinct enough to differentiate the various motions from each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yungher and Craelius then used an array of force sensors to measure pressure changes on the skin caused by muscular activity and a linear regression-based approach to accurately discriminate six different grasps with the arm in a fixed static position [23]. Li et al recently used an array of 32 force-sensitive resistor sensors combined with an SVM classifier for finger-motion recognition based on pressure distribution maps [24]. They were able to accurately identify 17 different finger motions in within-session validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on an electronic learning machine classifier, the methodology provided 92.33% accuracy with real-time performance. Alternatively, the identification of 17 hand postures comprising combinations of flexed fingers was proposed in [12]. The system was designed using a 32 FSR socket and signal processing by support vector machines, yielding >99% accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electromyography signals are severely affected by electromagnetic noise, sweat, and variations of transducer placement. Moreover, the application of feature extraction procedure over a large number of channels is required in order to decode the subject motions with a suitable dexterity level [11,12]. In this context, different methods such as the mechanomyography [13], sonomyography [14], optical myography [15,16], and the force myography (FMG) [17] have been proposed in order to overcome the drawbacks presented by the myoelectric case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%