2006
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2006.b0397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined treatment of landfill leachate with fecal supernatant in sequencing batch reactor

Abstract: Abstract:A laboratory-scale sequencing batch reactor (SBR) is used to treat landfill leachate containing high concentration of ammonium nitrogen with municipal fecal supernatant. The SBR system is operated in the following sequential phases: fill period, anoxic period, aeration period, settling period, decant and idle period. The results indicated that the average removal efficiencies of COD, BOD 5 , TN, Highly effective simultaneous nitrification and denitrification was achieved in the SBR system. The ratio o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results indicated that the average removal efficiency of TKN was 85%. They also found that there is a stable simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in this system (14). In some cases, the removal percentages obtained in this study were in agreement with the results obtained in some studies, while they were in contrast to some others.…”
Section: Total Nitrogen and Phosphorussupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Their results indicated that the average removal efficiency of TKN was 85%. They also found that there is a stable simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in this system (14). In some cases, the removal percentages obtained in this study were in agreement with the results obtained in some studies, while they were in contrast to some others.…”
Section: Total Nitrogen and Phosphorussupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The F/M ratio which was 0. 5 and COD were 98% and 94%, respectively (14). While in our study, the average removal efficiencies of BOD 5 and COD were lower due to the presence of interfering matters in the leachate such as nitrogen compounds, volatile fatty acids, heavy metals, ammonium, toxic, and pharmaceutical substances which inhibit biological activity.…”
Section: Cod Scod Rbcod and Bod5contrasting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…SBR processes were investigated for biological treatment of different types of wastewater, like municipal wastewater (Irvine et al, 1983), hazardous wastewater (Herzbrunn et al, 1985), leachate from older and younger landfill sites (Manoharan et al, 1992;Kulikowska and Klimiuk, 2003;Klimiuk and Kulikowska, 2005;Zhou et al, 2006), and industrial wastewater e.g. from textile processing industry (Hemmi et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%