2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00272-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined treatment of fourth ventricle ependymomas: report of 26 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
13
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,9,18 The prognostic value of histologic findings remains a controversial issue that most likely is attributable to sample size, variability in the definition of anaplasia, discrepancies in histologic diagnoses, and the inclusion in some series of ependymoblastomas and subependymomas, which exhibit different biologic behavior and should be analyzed separately. 1,4,5,9,[19][20][21][22] It is important to emphasize that, in the current study, 57 of 103 patients (55.3%) initially had an incorrect diagnosis of ependymoma. Four classes of pathologic misdiagnoses can be distinguished.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…5,9,18 The prognostic value of histologic findings remains a controversial issue that most likely is attributable to sample size, variability in the definition of anaplasia, discrepancies in histologic diagnoses, and the inclusion in some series of ependymoblastomas and subependymomas, which exhibit different biologic behavior and should be analyzed separately. 1,4,5,9,[19][20][21][22] It is important to emphasize that, in the current study, 57 of 103 patients (55.3%) initially had an incorrect diagnosis of ependymoma. Four classes of pathologic misdiagnoses can be distinguished.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…5,9,12,18,19,34 For this analysis, confounding factors included the unreliability of surgical assessment of the degree of ablation 35 and differences in the composition of compared groups with respect to age, performance status, and tumor grade, site, and size. In the current series, as in previous studies, 15,16 no statistically significant difference in overall survival was observed on univariate or multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Prognostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,21,22) All 4 patients with geriatric fourth ventricle ependymoma underwent surgical resection: gross total resection was achieved in 1 case, subtotal resection in 2 cases, and unknown in the other case. The difference in 5-year survival rate between tumor grades of posterior fossa ependymoma was not statistically significant, 21,27) and, in general, the degree of resection correlated with better prognosis. 13,17,27) Nevertheless, gross total resection may be difficult for ependymomas arising from the caudal half or the lateral part of the fourth ventricle, because critical anatomical structures are present around the tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The difference in 5-year survival rate between tumor grades of posterior fossa ependymoma was not statistically significant, 21,27) and, in general, the degree of resection correlated with better prognosis. 13,17,27) Nevertheless, gross total resection may be difficult for ependymomas arising from the caudal half or the lateral part of the fourth ventricle, because critical anatomical structures are present around the tumor. 13) Although the tumor origins of the 3 above cases are unknown, subtotal resection may be accepted in the elderly population to avoid postoperative complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation