2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation and Locomotor Training to Improve Walking Function and Reduce Spasticity in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Study of Clinical Feasibility and Efficacy

Abstract: Locomotor training (LT) is intended to improve walking function and can also reduce spasticity in motor-incomplete spinal cord injury (MISCI). Transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS) also influences these outcomes. We assessed feasibility and preliminary efficacy of combined LT + TSS during inpatient rehabilitation in a randomized, sham-controlled, pragmatic study. Eighteen individuals with subacute MISCI (2–6 months post-SCI) were enrolled and randomly assigned to the LT + TSS or the LT + TSSsham intervention… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is of specific relevance when treating individuals with severely limited mobility and further helps minimize the time needed to find individually tailored stimulation settings. Other studies of tSCS for neurorehabilitation have used a pragmatic design, placing a single active electrode over vertebral levels T11/T12 in all participants [20,38]. However, previous studies of EES in lower-limb motor control have pointed at the distinctive importance of the specific placement of active electrodes over lumbar and upper sacral spinal cord segments [1,6,27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of specific relevance when treating individuals with severely limited mobility and further helps minimize the time needed to find individually tailored stimulation settings. Other studies of tSCS for neurorehabilitation have used a pragmatic design, placing a single active electrode over vertebral levels T11/T12 in all participants [20,38]. However, previous studies of EES in lower-limb motor control have pointed at the distinctive importance of the specific placement of active electrodes over lumbar and upper sacral spinal cord segments [1,6,27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only two of the eight studies reviewed evaluated spasticity as a primary outcome measure. 29 , 34 The remainder of the studies evaluated spasticity as a secondary outcome, except for one which measured spasticity as a possible adverse event. 30 Sample size calculations were described in three studies, in which one used a secondary outcome measure to determine the sample size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSS also includes an ankle jerk score and ankle clonus score. Estes et al 29 also measured ankle clonus with the ankle clonus drop test. For their primary outcome of spasticity, however, Estes et al utilized the Wartenberg pendulum test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concomitant activation of anterior root efferents would lead to direct M wave-like responses superimposed on the EMG signals of the PRM reflexes, owing to their similar onset latencies [ 1 , 2 , 35 ]. In interventional studies using tonic transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation [ 10 , 11 , 13 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ], electrical activation of anterior roots would bypass the target spinal circuits and generate continuous contractions of the respectively innervated lower-limb muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trains of stimuli can therefore provide tonic multisegmental afferent input to the spinal cord, comparable with epidural spinal cord stimulation [ 6 ]. As a result, transcutaneous lumbar spinal cord stimulation has been used for neurophysiological studies by investigating reflex modulation in multiple lower limb muscles simultaneously [ 7 , 8 , 9 ] as well as for neuromodulation of sensorimotor function after spinal cord injury [ 10 , 11 , 12 ] and multiple sclerosis [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%