The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1987
DOI: 10.1159/000184484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Therapy for Selected Chronic Uremic Patients: Infrequent Hemodialysis and Nutritional Management

Abstract: The results are described of a combined nutritional (supplemented diet) and dialytic (once a week hemodialysis) therapy, employed in 17 selected chronic uremics for a mean period of 18.2 months/patient. The clinical findings, blood chemical abnormalities and changes of renal function were examined and compared with those of patients on the standard thrice-a-week dialysis schedule and free diet. The clinical findings were not significantly different in the two groups. The residual renal function of patients on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Evidence suggests that correct implementation of the nutritional regimen with an appropriate protein and energy intake may reduce the need for a conventional dialysis in particular, in motivated patients who comply with dietary instructions. In the 80s and 90s, Mitch and Sapir, 16 Giovannetti et al, 17 and Locatelli et al 18 proposed a very low-protein diet (0.3 g/kg/day) supplemented with essential amino acids and ketoacids, in combination with only once-weekly hemodialysis. The rationale behind this was to ensure an adequate metabolic control of the patients by reducing generation of uremic toxins upstream and providing some dialytic purification downstream, while preserving RKF longer by avoiding the need for ultrafiltration given that more frequent dialysis could worsen renal perfusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Evidence suggests that correct implementation of the nutritional regimen with an appropriate protein and energy intake may reduce the need for a conventional dialysis in particular, in motivated patients who comply with dietary instructions. In the 80s and 90s, Mitch and Sapir, 16 Giovannetti et al, 17 and Locatelli et al 18 proposed a very low-protein diet (0.3 g/kg/day) supplemented with essential amino acids and ketoacids, in combination with only once-weekly hemodialysis. The rationale behind this was to ensure an adequate metabolic control of the patients by reducing generation of uremic toxins upstream and providing some dialytic purification downstream, while preserving RKF longer by avoiding the need for ultrafiltration given that more frequent dialysis could worsen renal perfusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten patients were on a 3-times-weekly dialysis schedule and 10 patients were on a once-weekly dialysis combined with dietary treatment [13, 14]. All the patients were treated with acetate-free biofiltration lasting 3.5–4 h. The dialysate composition was: potassium 2 mmol/l, calcium 2 mmol/l, magnesium 0.37 mmol/l, sodium 139 mmol/l.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incremental dialysis is of particular interest; the concept, which originated from PD, supports implementing a progressively higher dialysis dose with a progressively reduced residual kidney function [129][130][131][132][133][134][135]. Several schedules are available, whose is beyond the aim of this paper.…”
Section: Choice Of Renal Replacement Therapy Has An Ecologic Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several schedules are available, whose is beyond the aim of this paper. In any case these patient-friendly approaches seem to allow preserving kidney function and lowering dialysis related comorbidity, in particular in association with dietary management [129][130][131][132][133][134][135]. From an ecologic point of view, incremental dialysis allows us to limit the carbon footprint, wastes and social costs, although, almost paradoxically, the treatment costs borne by the institutions providing care may be higher [136].…”
Section: Choice Of Renal Replacement Therapy Has An Ecologic Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%