Abstract:The results are described of a combined nutritional (supplemented diet) and dialytic (once a week hemodialysis) therapy, employed in 17 selected chronic uremics for a mean period of 18.2 months/patient. The clinical findings, blood chemical abnormalities and changes of renal function were examined and compared with those of patients on the standard thrice-a-week dialysis schedule and free diet. The clinical findings were not significantly different in the two groups. The residual renal function of patients on … Show more
“…15 Evidence suggests that correct implementation of the nutritional regimen with an appropriate protein and energy intake may reduce the need for a conventional dialysis in particular, in motivated patients who comply with dietary instructions. In the 80s and 90s, Mitch and Sapir, 16 Giovannetti et al, 17 and Locatelli et al 18 proposed a very low-protein diet (0.3 g/kg/day) supplemented with essential amino acids and ketoacids, in combination with only once-weekly hemodialysis. The rationale behind this was to ensure an adequate metabolic control of the patients by reducing generation of uremic toxins upstream and providing some dialytic purification downstream, while preserving RKF longer by avoiding the need for ultrafiltration given that more frequent dialysis could worsen renal perfusion.…”
Initiation of thrice-weekly hemodialysis often results in a rapid loss of residual kidney function (RKF) including reduction in urine output. Preserving RKF longer is associated with better outcomes including greater survival in dialysis patients. An alternative approach aimed at preserving RKF is an incremental transition with less frequent hemodialysis sessions at the beginning with gradual increase in hemodialysis frequency over months. In addition to favorable clinical and economic implications, an incremental transition would also enhance a less stressful adaptation of the patient to dialysis therapy. The current guidelines provide only limited recommendations for incremental hemodialysis approach, whereas the potential role of nutritional management of newly transitioned hemodialysis patients is largely overlooked. We have reviewed previous reports and case studies of once-weekly hemodialysis treatment combined with low-protein, low-phosphorus, and normal-to-high-energy diet especially for nondialysis days, whereas on dialysis days, high protein can be provided. Such an adaptive dietary regimen may elicit more favorable outcomes including better preserved RKF, lower β2-microglobulin levels, improved phosphorus control, and lower doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Clinical and nutritional status and RKF should be closely monitored throughout the transition to once and then twice-weekly regimen and eventually thrice-weekly hemodialysis. Further studies are needed to verify the long-term safety and implications of this approach to dialysis transition.
“…15 Evidence suggests that correct implementation of the nutritional regimen with an appropriate protein and energy intake may reduce the need for a conventional dialysis in particular, in motivated patients who comply with dietary instructions. In the 80s and 90s, Mitch and Sapir, 16 Giovannetti et al, 17 and Locatelli et al 18 proposed a very low-protein diet (0.3 g/kg/day) supplemented with essential amino acids and ketoacids, in combination with only once-weekly hemodialysis. The rationale behind this was to ensure an adequate metabolic control of the patients by reducing generation of uremic toxins upstream and providing some dialytic purification downstream, while preserving RKF longer by avoiding the need for ultrafiltration given that more frequent dialysis could worsen renal perfusion.…”
Initiation of thrice-weekly hemodialysis often results in a rapid loss of residual kidney function (RKF) including reduction in urine output. Preserving RKF longer is associated with better outcomes including greater survival in dialysis patients. An alternative approach aimed at preserving RKF is an incremental transition with less frequent hemodialysis sessions at the beginning with gradual increase in hemodialysis frequency over months. In addition to favorable clinical and economic implications, an incremental transition would also enhance a less stressful adaptation of the patient to dialysis therapy. The current guidelines provide only limited recommendations for incremental hemodialysis approach, whereas the potential role of nutritional management of newly transitioned hemodialysis patients is largely overlooked. We have reviewed previous reports and case studies of once-weekly hemodialysis treatment combined with low-protein, low-phosphorus, and normal-to-high-energy diet especially for nondialysis days, whereas on dialysis days, high protein can be provided. Such an adaptive dietary regimen may elicit more favorable outcomes including better preserved RKF, lower β2-microglobulin levels, improved phosphorus control, and lower doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Clinical and nutritional status and RKF should be closely monitored throughout the transition to once and then twice-weekly regimen and eventually thrice-weekly hemodialysis. Further studies are needed to verify the long-term safety and implications of this approach to dialysis transition.
“…Ten patients were on a 3-times-weekly dialysis schedule and 10 patients were on a once-weekly dialysis combined with dietary treatment [13, 14]. All the patients were treated with acetate-free biofiltration lasting 3.5–4 h. The dialysate composition was: potassium 2 mmol/l, calcium 2 mmol/l, magnesium 0.37 mmol/l, sodium 139 mmol/l.…”
The QTc dispersion reflects the underlying regional heterogeneity of the recovery of the ventricular excitability, thereby it is considered as a novel marker of risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Because a higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias is described during and after hemodialysis, the aim of this study has been to evaluate the QTc dispersion before and after uncomplicated hemodialysis session. Twenty chronic uremics without heart failure, ischemic heart disease or dialysis hypotension were selected. The QTc dispersion was determined as the difference between the longer and the shorter QTc interval measured on a 12-lead electrocardiogram. Following the hemodialysis session, the QTc dispersion increased from 30 ± 9 to 54 ± 17 ms (p < 0.001) associated with the expected reduction of potassium and magnesium and with the increase of extracellular calcium concentration. However, no correlation has been observed between the QTc dispersion increase and the degree of the intradialytic changes of plasma electrolytes, blood pressure or body weight. In summary, the hemodialysis treatment per se does induce an increase of the QTc dispersion, likely due to the rapid changes of electrolyte plasma concentrations. This can potentially contribute to the arrhythmogenic effect of the hemodialysis procedure, reflecting an enhanced regional heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization. The clinical importance of the increase of QTc dispersion as risk factor of ventricular arrhythmias, particularly in hemodialyzed patients suffering from ischemic or hypertrophic heart diseases, should be the matter of further investigations.
“…Incremental dialysis is of particular interest; the concept, which originated from PD, supports implementing a progressively higher dialysis dose with a progressively reduced residual kidney function [129][130][131][132][133][134][135]. Several schedules are available, whose is beyond the aim of this paper.…”
Section: Choice Of Renal Replacement Therapy Has An Ecologic Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several schedules are available, whose is beyond the aim of this paper. In any case these patient-friendly approaches seem to allow preserving kidney function and lowering dialysis related comorbidity, in particular in association with dietary management [129][130][131][132][133][134][135]. From an ecologic point of view, incremental dialysis allows us to limit the carbon footprint, wastes and social costs, although, almost paradoxically, the treatment costs borne by the institutions providing care may be higher [136].…”
Section: Choice Of Renal Replacement Therapy Has An Ecologic Impactmentioning
High-technology medicine saves lives and produces waste; this is the case of dialysis. The increasing amounts of waste products can be biologically dangerous in different ways: some represent a direct infectious or toxic danger for other living creatures (potentially contaminated or hazardous waste), while others are harmful for the planet (plastic and non-recycled waste). With the aim of increasing awareness, proposing joint actions and coordinating industrial and social interactions, the Italian Society of Nephrology is presenting this position statement on ways in which the environmental impact of caring for patients with kidney diseases can be reduced. Due to the particular relevance in waste management of dialysis, which produces up to 2 kg of potentially contaminated waste per session and about the same weight of potentially recyclable materials, together with technological waste (dialysis machines), and involves high water and electricity consumption, the position statement mainly focuses on dialysis management, identifying ten first affordable actions: (1) reducing the burden of dialysis (whenever possible adopting an intent to delay strategy, with wide use of incremental schedules); (2) limiting drugs and favouring "natural" medicine focussing on lifestyle and diet; (3) encouraging the reuse of "household" hospital material; (4) recycling paper and glass; (5) recycling non-contaminated plastic; (6) reducing water consumption; (7) reducing energy consumption; (8) introducing environmental-impact criteria in checklists for evaluating dialysis machines and supplies; (9) encouraging well-planned triage of contaminated and non-contaminated materials; (10) demanding planet-friendly approaches in the building of new facilities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.