2001
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.2.343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Tamoxifen and Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Agonist Versus LHRH Agonist Alone in Premenopausal Advanced Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Four Randomized Trials

Abstract: The combination of LHRH agonist plus tamoxifen is superior to LHRH agonist alone in premenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Therefore, if a premenopausal woman with advanced breast cancer is thought to be suitable for endocrine treatment, it is proposed that the combination of a LHRH agonist plus tamoxifen be considered as the new standard treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
137
0
30

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
137
0
30
Order By: Relevance
“…In the metastatic setting, one trial demonstrated a 1-year survival benefit from buserelin, the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, combined with tamoxifen compared to either treatment alone in premenopausal women with ER+ breast cancers. 31 Houghton et al 32 presented their findings from the "Zoladex in Premenopausal Patients" (ZIPP) trial in 2000. Women with early-stage breast cancer (n = 2,631) were randomized to receive either tamoxifen for 2 years, goserelin for 26 months, tamoxifen plus goserelin, or no adjuvant treatment.…”
Section: Variation In Reporting Time Points Of Amenorrheamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the metastatic setting, one trial demonstrated a 1-year survival benefit from buserelin, the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, combined with tamoxifen compared to either treatment alone in premenopausal women with ER+ breast cancers. 31 Houghton et al 32 presented their findings from the "Zoladex in Premenopausal Patients" (ZIPP) trial in 2000. Women with early-stage breast cancer (n = 2,631) were randomized to receive either tamoxifen for 2 years, goserelin for 26 months, tamoxifen plus goserelin, or no adjuvant treatment.…”
Section: Variation In Reporting Time Points Of Amenorrheamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An early nonrandomised clinical study suggested possible extension of the duration of response upon addition of the antioestrogen tamoxifen to goserelin in premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer (Dixon et al, 1991). More recently, a meta-analysis of four studies has revealed that using the combination of goserelin and tamoxifen as initial therapy produced a significantly longer time to first progression than using goserelin alone (Klijn et al, 2001). The rationale for this therapy is that, having effectively rendered the patient postmenopausal with the use of goserelin, the effect of peripheral E2 production in promoting hormone-sensitive breast cancer growth is inhibited by tamoxifen, as in postmenopausal women.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, from the viewpoint of the ABC3 panelists (90.6 %), radiomenolysis is also an option in order to achieve lasting ovarian ablation. The German expert group specifies that additional ovarian suppression is standard for premenopausal patients [19]. Permanent suppression of the ovaries using radiotherapy should only take place in case of contraindications against GnRH analogues and if a bilateral oophorectomy as endocrine ablation is significantly delayed.…”
Section: Focus On Pre-menopausal Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%