2018
DOI: 10.7150/jbji.22799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Staining Techniques for Demonstration of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm in Routine Histopathology

Abstract: Aim: Visualization of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm using histochemical staining and combined histochemistry (HC) and immunohistochemistry (IHC).Methods: The ability of S. aureus S54F9 to form biofilm was tested in vitro. Hereafter, infected bone tissue was collected from two different porcine models of osteomyelitis inoculated with S. aureus strain S54F9. The infection time was five and fifteen days, respectively. Twenty-five different histochemical staining protocols were tested in order to find the stains t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, aggregate formation was an inevitable process of bacterial growth in low-shear conditions with no surface for attachment. Thus, magnetic levitation conditions mimic an infection-related environment that occurs in the restricted space of alveoli, mucosal tissues, and cytoplasm (4,16,34,35,39,41,42,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rather, aggregate formation was an inevitable process of bacterial growth in low-shear conditions with no surface for attachment. Thus, magnetic levitation conditions mimic an infection-related environment that occurs in the restricted space of alveoli, mucosal tissues, and cytoplasm (4,16,34,35,39,41,42,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of an external supporting surface in aggregate formation is an important difference that points to limitations of existing in vitro biofilm models (reviewed by Roberts and coauthors [43]). Another specific feature of clinically relevant bacterial aggregates is the absence of the shear stress in the host tissues (4,16,35,39,41,42,44). To study properties of nonattached aggregates, an increasing number of in vitro models has appeared in recent years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intact scrotal skin may be particularly susceptible to biofilm formation due to its thin epidermis and irregular surface, as evidence shows that biofilms form more easily on rough surfaces [ 12 ]. Visualization of biofilm is difficult using routine light microscopy and typically requires specialized staining or microscopy techniques (e.g., electron microscopy) [ 20 , 25 , 26 ]. Therefore, it is expected that the punch biopsy performed early in this patient’s disease course would appear essentially normal as evidence of a cutaneous microbial biofilm was not specifically sought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 14 This strain has been characterized by whole-genome sequencing, 15 and has the ability to form biofilm both in vitro and in vivo. 16 The final inoculum was 10 4 colony-forming units (CFUs) in 10 μl.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 14 Samples from Group C were also stained with a biofilm-specific stain based on a combination of IHC towards S. aureus and Alcian blue pH3. 16 In all groups, the bone voids were localized and the pathological bone area (PBA) was measured. 13 PBA was defined as the maximum perpendicular distance from the edge of the bone void (the IC in Group A) and until normal pattern of trabecular bone and marrow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%