Combined spinal-epidural technique: Single-space vs double distant space technique

Slavkovic, Zoran; Stamenković, Dušica; Gerić, Veselin; Veljović, Milić; Ivanović, N.; Todorović, Slobodan; Maric, P.; Καρανικόλας, Μενέλαος

doi:10.2298/vsp1310953s

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Usvajanjem jednoobraznog uputstva za pripremu rada, povećao se broj mladih istraživača koji tokom stasavanja u poznate naučnike, pripremaju doktorske/magistarske teze [30], i objavljuju rukopise u prestižnim domaćim [31,32] ili svetskim časopisima [33][34][35][36]. Obaveza svakog istraživača, je da deluje u skladu sa etičkim normama naučno-istraživačkog kodeksa, i da učestvuje u otkrivanju i suzbijanju svakog oblika devijantnog ponašanja.…”

Section: Diskusija I Zaključakunclassified

Scientific misconduct

Todorović¹,

Tošković²,

Čolaković³

et al. 2020

Halo 194

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the creation of a global computer network, the internet, all manner of information has become available to scientists and everyone else around the world. The exchange of information gives scientists insight into the most recent scientific discoveries while enabling them at the same time to use the information for their research. Scientists and experts must be sure that their colleagues' research is valid, objective and the results complete. These scientific research characteristics represent scientific honesty. Scientific misconduct can take various forms and can be present in all phases of the scientific research process, but most commonly takes the form of fabrication, falsification and plagiarism. The reasons for scientific misconduct can be personal, professional and financial. There is also a "grey zone", which consists of data manipulation and selection, reference citing mistakes, multiple and salami publications, problematic authorships. Every type of misconduct has a detrimental effect on the scientific community. In the public eye, scientists are benevolent seekers of truth with high moral integrity, whose work is of key value to society. Any type of scientific misconduct serves to dishonour the scientific community but also brings confusion into the work of other researchers, therefore significantly slowing down scientific discovery in whole. Digitalization and technological advancement significantly contribute to the early discovery, elimination and sanctioning of any kind of research misconduct. A significant improvement in solving these problems can be achieved through adequate education of young researchers and introducing laws that precisely define penalties for breaking the code of good scientific practice.

show abstract