1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01588225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined phase I—phase II methods of feasible directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows from [9] and Lemmas 1 and 3 of [6] that for all z EF c there exists a > 0 and a O > 0 such that: Step O. Seti=j--0.…”
Section: A Stabilised Conceptual Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It follows from [9] and Lemmas 1 and 3 of [6] that for all z EF c there exists a > 0 and a O > 0 such that: Step O. Seti=j--0.…”
Section: A Stabilised Conceptual Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The maps A 1 and A 2 are defined as follows. For all z in R", all e>0, the first order search direction %(z) is defined [9] to be the solution of the quadratic program:…”
Section: A Stabilised Conceptual Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If x is a feasible point, it is clear that (x) = 0, and then (1.3) reduces to the direction finding problem of Topkis and Veinott's feasible direction method [26]. Because their inner feasible direction algorithms only use the information of first derivatives, these phase I-phase II algorithms in [23] converge linearly at best. In order to increase the speed of convergence, combining the ideas from [23] and feasible SQP, Jian [12,Ch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…So roughly speaking, the goal of this paper is to present a unified algorithm that well combines the phase of computing a feasible point and the phase of a feasible SQP algorithm. An early version of phase I-phase II method we mention here for solving problem (P) was proposed by Polak et al [23]. Their algorithms can automatically produce a feasible starting point and then perform the operation of feasible direction algorithm to get an optimal solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the MFD always requires a feasible initial point, so an auxiliary procedure must be considered for obtaining such a starting point, further sometimes solving the auxiliary problem may be difficult as solving the original one itself. To overcome this shortcoming, Polak, Trahan, and Mayne [11] presented a combined Phase I-Phase II algorithm with an arbitrary initial point in 1979. The algorithm becomes an MFD when the iterative point gets into the feasible set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%