2021
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s282440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Phacoemulsification and 360-Degree Endocyclophotocoagulation with and without a Kahook Dual Blade in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, we demonstrate that patients who underwent PEcK, Phaco/ECP, or Phaco/KDB experienced significant reductions in both IOP and medication burden for more than 36 months, which is the first time that PEcK outcomes have been reported for more than 12 months postoperatively. 1 , 2 , 17 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further, we demonstrate that patients who underwent PEcK, Phaco/ECP, or Phaco/KDB experienced significant reductions in both IOP and medication burden for more than 36 months, which is the first time that PEcK outcomes have been reported for more than 12 months postoperatively. 1 , 2 , 17 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being rarely reported, PEcK was associated in our study with a 12-month reduction in mean IOP of 3.8 mmHg on 1.1 fewer medications, which showed similar efficacy to that reported by Izquierdo et al and Klug et al The latter study suggested potentially greater efficacy of PEcK compared to ICE which had an associated 12-month reduction in mean IOP of 1.4 mmHg on 0.8 fewer medications. 2 , 17 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the study had similar problems as the study by Ferguson and colleagues; the patients had significantly higher baseline IOP and a more negative mean deviation value than the Phaco/iStent group. Izquierdo et al 174 performed a randomized, prospective study that compared the outcome of uncontrolled OAG patients who underwent combined phacoemulsification, ECP, and KDB (PEcK group) versus phacoemulsification with ECP (Phaco/ECP group). Of the ECP, 360 degrees were performed for both groups, with an additional 120 degrees of pigmented TM removed for the PEcK group.…”
Section: Combined Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Izquierdo et al 174 performed a randomized, prospective study that compared the outcome of uncontrolled OAG patients who underwent combined phacoemulsification, ECP, and KDB (PEcK group) versus phacoemulsification with ECP (Phaco/ECP group). Of the ECP, 360 degrees were performed for both groups, with an additional 120 degrees of pigmented TM removed for the PEcK group.…”
Section: Combined Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%