2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2017.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined mutations in five wheat STARCH BRANCHING ENZYME II genes improve resistant starch but affect grain yield and bread-making quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the ssIIa mutants had a significantly poorer GPI compared to controls (average of 0.41 vs. 0.64). Schönhofen et al () also found significant increases for all SRC solvents in high amylose SBEII nulls, along with increased starch damage and increased wet gluten.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the ssIIa mutants had a significantly poorer GPI compared to controls (average of 0.41 vs. 0.64). Schönhofen et al () also found significant increases for all SRC solvents in high amylose SBEII nulls, along with increased starch damage and increased wet gluten.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This is consistent with flour protein results where ssIIa combinations had a higher protein content than combinations 3 and 4 (Table ). The difference in protein content between the four ssIIa mutants and their wild‐type controls was greater in the flour (average of +4%) (Table ) than it was in the grain (average of +2%) (Hogg et al, ), which was also observed in high amylose SBEII null hexaploid wheat (Schönhofen et al, ). Fundamentally, the higher protein content in the ssIIa mutants should enhance bread making, but that was not the case in this study since amylose and non‐starch polysaccharides were also increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations