2002
DOI: 10.1378/chest.122.1.344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair and Direct Coronary Artery Bypass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach would be to use bilateral mini-thoracotomies as previously reported. 1 This is likely to be far more painful than the approach described in this report. Combined mitral valve repair and coronary artery bypass via unilateral thoracotomy has been reported.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Another approach would be to use bilateral mini-thoracotomies as previously reported. 1 This is likely to be far more painful than the approach described in this report. Combined mitral valve repair and coronary artery bypass via unilateral thoracotomy has been reported.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This would be much more difficult than the case described here using existing technology. Another approach would be to use bilateral mini‐thoracotomies as previously reported 1 . This is likely to be far more painful than the approach described in this report.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alternatively, redocking the robot to the other side of the chest can be considered challenging, adding complexity and length to the procedure. There have been reports of concomitant minimally invasive MVR and coronary bypass, but these have involved the use of minithoracotomy 17 or ministernotomy incisions. 18,19 The ability to reach the anterolateral surface of the heart for LIMA-LAD grafting was fairly easy via the standard rightsided chest ports used for MVR, especially once the heart was decompressed on CPB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%