2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined measurements – A way to improve the measurement accuracy of an additive quantity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Siuda and Grabowski (2012); Wiora et al (2013), a combined measurement method has been proposed that improves the measurement accuracy of additive quantities. Additivity of a quantity means that it must satisfy the following distribution rule: if an object o, characterized by the value x of a quantity X, can be divided into n parts o 1 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Siuda and Grabowski (2012); Wiora et al (2013), a combined measurement method has been proposed that improves the measurement accuracy of additive quantities. Additivity of a quantity means that it must satisfy the following distribution rule: if an object o, characterized by the value x of a quantity X, can be divided into n parts o 1 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of additive quantities are mass, length, DC voltage, etc. In Wiora et al (2016), the proposed approach in Siuda and Grabowski (2012) has been extended to the case of heteroscedasticity by means of applying the weighted least squares. The method provides resulting uncertainty is less than that assessed directly from experiments using Type B uncertainty evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, two calibrating methods are widely used. One is known as integrated calibration method [5,6]. In this method, errors are solved and optimized by employing the least square method based on calibration results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is easy and simple to implement, but its accuracy is low. Another way is the separated calibration method [6,7]. It calibrates the error parameters by rigorous calibration procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%