2019
DOI: 10.1111/tri.13413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined liver–kidney transplantation versus liver transplant alone based on KDIGO stratification of estimated glomerular filtration rate: data from the United Kingdom Transplant registry – a retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Patient selection for combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) is a current issue on the background of organ shortage. This study aimed to compare outcomes and post-transplant renal function for patients receiving CLKT and liver transplantation alone (LTA) based on native renal function using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) stratification. Using the UK National transplant database (NHSBT) 6035 patients receiving a LTA (N = 5912; 98%) or CLKT (N = 123; 2%) [2001][2002][2003][2004][2005][2006][20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(46 reference statements)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of outcomes and post-transplant kidney function between patients who underwent kidney/liver transplant and liver transplant alone was made using eGFR stratification. Tinti and coworkers [ 47 ] analyzed the UK National Transplant Database (NHSBT) and evaluated 6035 patients receiving an LTA ( n = 5912; 98%) vs. CLKT ( n = 123; 2%); analysis was made after stratification by KDIGO stages of eGFR at transplant. No difference in patient and graft survival between LTA and CLKT patients in various eGFR group/strata occurred (NS).…”
Section: Hcc Chronic Kidney Disease and Interventional Management (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of outcomes and post-transplant kidney function between patients who underwent kidney/liver transplant and liver transplant alone was made using eGFR stratification. Tinti and coworkers [ 47 ] analyzed the UK National Transplant Database (NHSBT) and evaluated 6035 patients receiving an LTA ( n = 5912; 98%) vs. CLKT ( n = 123; 2%); analysis was made after stratification by KDIGO stages of eGFR at transplant. No difference in patient and graft survival between LTA and CLKT patients in various eGFR group/strata occurred (NS).…”
Section: Hcc Chronic Kidney Disease and Interventional Management (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If sCr is decreased, the prognosis of transplantation can be improved [ 180 ]. If CRRT therapy was established at the time of liver transplantation, then the prognosis for transplantation alone was worsened [ 181 ]. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of ≤35 mL/min or measured GFR of ≤25 mL/min for ≥4 weeks was an important criterion for combined liver–kidney transplantation [ 182 ].…”
Section: Treatment Of Hrs-aki With Aclfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies are focused on patients with the most impaired renal function, such as those with creatinine (Cr) ≥ 2.5 mg/dl or with a need for dialysis (10,11). There is scarce information regarding outcomes of patients with moderate renal impairment after LT, and the impact of liver disease etiology on renal function recovery has not been fully addressed (12). Presumably, a higher incidence of structural kidney injury in the NAFLD population and overestimation of renal function when using serum Cr, may lead to overlook a significant and irreversible renal impairment in this vulnerable group of patients (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of this, certain proposals have been made by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) to offer some guidance on SLKT allocation, resulting in the inclusion of the latest consensus in OPTN official policies of 2017 (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). These are valuable criteria, but they still lack solid demonstration of a benefit in survival, and other studies show that glomerular filtration rate (GFR) alone may not guide SLKT indication (12,31,32). New predictive factors are needed in order to better support the decision making process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%