2005
DOI: 10.1007/11539087_134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Kernel Function Approach in SVM for Diagnosis of Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The table gives the number of genes and the classification accuracy reported by each author (Reported ) and the classification accuracy obtained by our approach (GeSeX) when we fix the number of genes to the value used in the corresponding paper. [17] [ our method, that means that for each data set and each previously cited work [17,22,8,16], we determine which classification accuracy can be obtained by our GA for the number of genes reported in this work. Moreover, we evaluate the classifier accuracy with the same number of runs: for [17] and [22], the result is the best accuracy obtained in one run while for [8] and [16], this is the average over 10 runs.…”
Section: Experimental Context and Results Of Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The table gives the number of genes and the classification accuracy reported by each author (Reported ) and the classification accuracy obtained by our approach (GeSeX) when we fix the number of genes to the value used in the corresponding paper. [17] [ our method, that means that for each data set and each previously cited work [17,22,8,16], we determine which classification accuracy can be obtained by our GA for the number of genes reported in this work. Moreover, we evaluate the classifier accuracy with the same number of runs: for [17] and [22], the result is the best accuracy obtained in one run while for [8] and [16], this is the average over 10 runs.…”
Section: Experimental Context and Results Of Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] [ our method, that means that for each data set and each previously cited work [17,22,8,16], we determine which classification accuracy can be obtained by our GA for the number of genes reported in this work. Moreover, we evaluate the classifier accuracy with the same number of runs: for [17] and [22], the result is the best accuracy obtained in one run while for [8] and [16], this is the average over 10 runs. We also use the same test samples as the authors for each dataset, this is important because previous studies have shown that the accuracy estimate may be biased and may have an important variance [3].…”
Section: Experimental Context and Results Of Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations