2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2017.7989620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined inverse-dynamics/passivity-based control for robots with elastic joints

Abstract: Abstract-We consider the global tracking control problem of robots with elastic joints. Even if joint elasticity introduces beneficial features for modern applications which require physically resilient and safer robots that can interact with the environment or humans, it challenges the achievable control performance. We propose a novel controller which combines the benefits of two approaches: the intrinsic robustness to model uncertainty from passivity-based control and the implementation efficiency of invers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our proposed framework has also been successfully applied to a different reconfigurable robot test bed with elastic joint modules in [31]. Additionally, this framework can easily incorporate robust control approaches [32], [33], when model uncertainties, unknown loads and disturbances have a significant impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proposed framework has also been successfully applied to a different reconfigurable robot test bed with elastic joint modules in [31]. Additionally, this framework can easily incorporate robust control approaches [32], [33], when model uncertainties, unknown loads and disturbances have a significant impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedback linearization relies on exact cancellation of system coupling and may be sensitive to model mismatches. 18 Other flexible-joint robot motion control methods are based on backstepping control, known as two-stage state feedback (SFB) control. The SFB control is based on the idea of considering joint elastic torque or motor position as an intermediate virtual input to be used to control the link dynamics.…”
Section: Review On Control Approaches For Flexible-joint Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is seen that increasing closed-loop stiffness through λ R in (16)- (18) leads to a faster response and higher disturbance rejection. However, too much stiffness may cause an excessive oscillation in the transient response if flexible mode frequencies in (8) and (9) are unintentionally excited.…”
Section: Bandwidth Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brogliato compared three kinds of global tracking schemes: the decoupling-based scheme, the backstepping-based scheme and the passivity-based scheme [10]. Passivity-based schemes which avoid complete feedback linearization have a more robust performance, such as the control scheme proposed by Giusti which is a combined inverse-dynamics/passivity-based (ID/PB) controller [11,12]. However, all of the above-mentioned schemes are concerned with the control of a single robot manipulator with elastic joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%