2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2012.08.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined inhibition of complement and CD14 efficiently attenuated the inflammatory response induced by Staphylococcus aureus in a human whole blood model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, compstatin has shown consistent efficacy in blocking inflammatory and procoagulant reactions in a human whole blood model of bacterial inflammation that closely resembles acute septicaemia [65][66][67][68]. Furthermore, recent studies have suggested that anti-CD14 treatment might confer additive protection against LPS shock or Gram-positive or polymicrobial bacterial challenge, when combined with C3 or C5 inhibition [69][70][71].…”
Section: Probing the Therapeutic Efficacy Of Compstatin Analogues In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, compstatin has shown consistent efficacy in blocking inflammatory and procoagulant reactions in a human whole blood model of bacterial inflammation that closely resembles acute septicaemia [65][66][67][68]. Furthermore, recent studies have suggested that anti-CD14 treatment might confer additive protection against LPS shock or Gram-positive or polymicrobial bacterial challenge, when combined with C3 or C5 inhibition [69][70][71].…”
Section: Probing the Therapeutic Efficacy Of Compstatin Analogues In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of complement and CD14 inhibition on Grampositive bacteria is sparsely evaluated. One study using various strains of Staphylococcus aureus in a human whole-blood model demonstrated that simultaneous inhibition of CD14 and complement efficiently reduced the inflammatory response [78]. However, and contrary to Gram-negative-induced inflammation, the responses were primarily dependent on complement, whereas CD14 played a lesser important role.…”
Section: Combined Inhibition Of Complement and Cd14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inflammatory response in Gram-positive sepsis is more complement-driven compared to the Gram-negative response, which is largely LPS-dependent and therefore more TLR-4-driven [28]. Although both complement and CD14 play vital roles mediating E. coli-as well as S. aureus-induced inflammation, it is uncertain whether the anti-CD14 effects observed on the S. aureus-induced responses reflect the involvement of TLR-2, TLR-9 or other TLRs [21,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%