2020
DOI: 10.1177/1553350620942980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Gaze Metrics as Stress-Sensitive Indicators of Microsurgical Proficiency

Abstract: Background. Evaluation of microsurgical proficiency is conventionally subjective, time consuming, and unreliable. Eye movement–based metrics have been promising not only in detection of surgical expertise but also in identifying actual cognitive stress and workload. We investigated if pupil dilations and blinks could be utilized in parallel to accurately classify microsurgical proficiency and its moderating features, especially task-related stress. Methods. Participants (n = 11) were divided into groups based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, experienced surgeons showed smaller changes in pupil dilation than less experienced operators [63]. Finally, average and SD of pupil size changes during suturing successfully classified surgical expertise while fatigue, caffeine, and illumination changes were possible reasons for no classification improvement from blink rate features [62].…”
Section: Objective and Subjective Measuresmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, experienced surgeons showed smaller changes in pupil dilation than less experienced operators [63]. Finally, average and SD of pupil size changes during suturing successfully classified surgical expertise while fatigue, caffeine, and illumination changes were possible reasons for no classification improvement from blink rate features [62].…”
Section: Objective and Subjective Measuresmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Intraoperative stress across surgical roles and expertise. Seventeen papers (23.94%) compared surgical performance and stress markers between individuals from two expertise levels -novice versus expert or junior versus senior residents and surgeons [38], [62], [63], [66], [78], [86], [90], [96], [105], [109], [117], [121], or among surgical professionals with diverse professional backgrounds [6], [44], [64], [84], [118]. Six studies compared stress and technical performance when participants switched their roles between primary and assistant surgeons [4], [77], [86], [92], [108], [122], and two papers measured stress, anxiety, and workload from teams of surgeons, nurses, technicians, and assistants [66], [92].…”
Section: B Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations