2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.09.08.459492
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined free energy calculation and machine learning methods for understanding ligand unbinding kinetics

Abstract: The determination of drug residence times, which define the time an inhibitor is in complex with its target, is a fundamental part of the drug discovery process. Synthesis and experimental pharmacokinetics measurements are, however, expensive, and time-consuming. In this work, we aimed to obtain drug residence times computationally. Furthermore, we propose a novel algorithm to identify molecular design objectives based on ligand unbinding kinetics. We designed an enhanced sampling technique to accurately predi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation is considerably tricky, and few studies have succeeded. It has been done only for weak binders to proteins and proteinprotein association by a number of brutally long-time MD simulations 4,59 or by indirect calculation from binding free energy and 𝑘 +,, value 60 . One exception is recent works by Wolf S. et al: They proposed the novel idea that dissipated-corrected TMD simulation is combined with onedimensional Langevin dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation is considerably tricky, and few studies have succeeded. It has been done only for weak binders to proteins and proteinprotein association by a number of brutally long-time MD simulations 4,59 or by indirect calculation from binding free energy and 𝑘 +,, value 60 . One exception is recent works by Wolf S. et al: They proposed the novel idea that dissipated-corrected TMD simulation is combined with onedimensional Langevin dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation is considerably difficult, and only a few studies have been successful. It has been performed only for weak binders to proteins and protein-protein association by brutally long-time MD simulations 4,60 or by indirect calculation from the binding free energy and 𝑘 +,, value 61 . One exception is the recent work by Wolf et al, who proposed the novel idea that dissipated-corrected targeted molecular dynamics (TMD) simulation is combined with one-dimensional Langevin dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the Gini feature importance 58 to evaluate the relevance of the features from the GBDT models, averaged across the 100 trainings to calculate their relative feature importance (RFI). To identify key features in MLP models, we removed the variance from each feature one-by-one 29 and assessed the accuracy drop they encounter when predicting outcomes with the trained models. If the accuracy of the prediction is greatly reduced when a feature is altered, the feature was considered important for the description of the TS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unbinding procedure was followed as described in our previously published 29 protocol. After the equilibration, a 20 ns production run without any restraints was performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation