2000
DOI: 10.1067/mem.2000.108182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined evidence-based literature analysis and consensus guidelines for stocking of emergency antidotes in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Antidote supply for each hospital was classified as sufficient or insufficient based on the consensus guidelines. 2 …”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Antidote supply for each hospital was classified as sufficient or insufficient based on the consensus guidelines. 2 …”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Prior to 2000, there were no concise, evidencebased guidelines for stocking of emergency antidotes. 2 In the absence of such guidelines, physicians and pharmacists may not know which antidotes need to be stocked. They may conclude, for example, that a rarely used antidote is not worth stocking, or they may be unaware of the need for timely administration of certain antidotes and assume they can obtain these from other facilities in the area at the time they are necessary.…”
Section: Why Is Antidote Stocking Inadequate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations