2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined energetic, economic and climate change assessment of heat pumps for industrial waste heat recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it will be necessary to accept action plans for the recovery capacities at the level of autonomies as soon as possible. The task is also to find a way to solve non-recycled communal waste in the sense of the waste economy hierarchy [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it will be necessary to accept action plans for the recovery capacities at the level of autonomies as soon as possible. The task is also to find a way to solve non-recycled communal waste in the sense of the waste economy hierarchy [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also reached conclusions about the major modifications to the U.S. electricity infrastructure needed to achieve this wide-scale electrification. The importance of the carbon footprint of the electricity network was also highlighted in [7]. Schoeneberger et al [8] stressed the necessity to take into account the environmental content of the grid mix to appropriately quantify the savings.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Environmental Impact Of The Electrificatio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change (budgeting 2015-2040) 1.23 [44] Climate change (budgeting 2040-2065) 2.22 [44] Climate change (budgeting 2065-2090) 16.08 [44] Ozone depletion 0.28 [22] Ionizing radiation 0.01 [22] Photochemical ozone formation 0.54 [22] Particulate matter 5.97 [22] Human toxicity, non-cancer 0.9 [22] Human toxicity, cancer 0.26 [22] Acidification 0.3 [22] Eutrophication, freshwater 3.22 [22] Eutrophication, marine 8.2 [43] Eutrophication, terrestrial 0.3 [22] Ecotoxicity, freshwater 0.85 [22] Land use 9.33 [22] Water use 0.51 [22] Resource use, fossils 4.08 [22] Resource use, minerals and metals 4.08 [22] At the level of a particular human activity or an industrial sector, the sustainable level from sector (SL s,y ) is derived from SL tot,y following Equation (7): SL s,y = SL tot,y •τ s,y (7) where τ s,y represents the share of environmental impact y authorised for the considered sector "s", which depends on the importance of this sector in relation to all human activities. The sum of τ s,y for all human activities must be lower than or equal to 1 in order not to exceed the sustainable limit for impact category "y".…”
Section: Impact Category Reduction Factor Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The payback time (PBP) and the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) were calculated for the economic feasibility evaluation. The payback time was used as a metric based on Jovet et al assessment of the decision-making in industrial waste heat recovery long-term project planning and the same calculation method was used in this study [24]. The calculation of LCOE was based on the method described in Lotfi et al on the evaluation of LCOE for microgrids [25].…”
Section: Waste Heat Potential Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%