2020
DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0160(17)60428-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined effects of soil texture and machine operating trail gradient on changes in forest soil physical properties during ground-based skidding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Terrain-related factors are normally inherent to a harvest site and are thereby difficult to adjust, particularly once operations are on-going. However, despite the reduced possibilities for alterations, factors such as slope [12,23,[28][29][30][31],…”
Section: Terrain-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Terrain-related factors are normally inherent to a harvest site and are thereby difficult to adjust, particularly once operations are on-going. However, despite the reduced possibilities for alterations, factors such as slope [12,23,[28][29][30][31],…”
Section: Terrain-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, these adverse effects can hinder root and tree growth [20], and negatively affect site productivity [21]. The degree and extent of soil compaction and rutting during mechanized logging operations is often influenced by the type and characteristics of the harvesting system, number of machine passes, terrain slope, soil type, texture and water content as well as silvicultural treatments [2,3,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependence of soil bulk density values on the particle-size distribution has been reported elsewhere, and the study used soil texture for the online prediction of soil compaction status [20]. Fine texture layers of soil under the mature plantation might cause the particles to be closer to each other, resulting in higher bulk density values than the coarse soil under the young plantation.…”
Section: A Soil Profile Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Hamed and Khalafallah [56] found similar findings regarding BD values ranged from 1.22 to 1.73 Mg m −3 with a mean of 1.42 Mg m −3 . Obviously, the soil texture had a large influence on the variation of soil bulk density values due to its effects on average pore size and mechanical resistance, as well as the decrease in soil organic matter content in the study area [65]. The infiltration rate (IR) ranged from low to high and was influenced by soil texture [47].…”
Section: Soil Physicochemical Indicators Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%