2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined effects of leg length discrepancy and the addition of distal mass on gait asymmetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was not a statistically significant interaction between the amount of mass added and amount of added leg length, F (4, 36) = 0.20, p = 0.49. This is similar to the effects observed in our lab's previous study (Muratagic et al, 2017 ). Further, the post-hoc comparisons for mass revealed significant difference between no mass and both small and large mass conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There was not a statistically significant interaction between the amount of mass added and amount of added leg length, F (4, 36) = 0.20, p = 0.49. This is similar to the effects observed in our lab's previous study (Muratagic et al, 2017 ). Further, the post-hoc comparisons for mass revealed significant difference between no mass and both small and large mass conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This kind of behavior is illustrated with the different perturbations and hence, these opposite effects tend to cancel each other out which results in a lower CGAM value. A previous study conducted by Muratagic et al ( 2017 ) found that there were no significant effects observed due to the combination of LLD and distal. However, the study also observed some cancellation effects due to the combination of LLD and mass which showed that there are potential combinations that could result in a balanced gait pattern.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, when comparing the stress response between the longer limb and lower limb, the longer limb generally experiences more force hence the maximum stress built-up on the pelvic bone is higher, which leads to a slightly higher fracture risk compared to the shorter limb. The trend of longer limb experiencing greater force than the other limb is supported by findings from Muratagic et al [22], which found an identical trend in terms of force experienced by the limbs. Moving forward, when the stress-strain response increases in its maximum value due to having LLD, there is a concern if the high-er stress caused by having LLD will increase the chance of getting a bone fracture at the pelvic region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%