2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined effects of gamma radiation and arsenite on the proteome of human TK6 lymphoblastoid cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Animal and cellular studies have been used as a tool to identify potential biomarkers that then may be tested in molecular epidemiological studies [173][174][175][176][177]. Marchetti et al conducted a literature review of candidate protein biomarkers for individual radiation biodosimetry of exposure to IR [178].…”
Section: Biomarkers Related To Changes In Protein Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal and cellular studies have been used as a tool to identify potential biomarkers that then may be tested in molecular epidemiological studies [173][174][175][176][177]. Marchetti et al conducted a literature review of candidate protein biomarkers for individual radiation biodosimetry of exposure to IR [178].…”
Section: Biomarkers Related To Changes In Protein Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, arsenic may act on stem or progenitor cells of the bronchial epithelium by altering the expression of genes involved in key regulatory pathways. Indeed, arsenic has been shown to inhibit protein tyrosine and serine/threonine phosphatases, regulatory enzymes that often carry a thiol group in their active center, and to alter the expression of many kinases implicated in signaling pathways (Andrew et al 2003;Cavigelli et al 1996;Huang et al 1995;Tapio et al 2005). In line with this, large-scale expression analysis revealed that speciWc lung developmental pathways are reactivated in NSCLC (Borczuk et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focused our study on 24 radiation responsive ERP29 ERP29 candidate genes because these genes were previously documented to be connected with functions intimately linked to cancer (Table 2). [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Among the 24 genes, observations from previous studies noted post CT changes within 1 hour after radiation in 11 genes with 4 of them (ATM, ERP29, TP53, CDKN2A) showing post CT changes from very low radiation doses, as low as 0.1 Gy. Owing to their higher radiosensitivity, children are expected to react more sensitively than adults to the CT-induced radiation insult, and therefore, we included all 24 genes in our study, although some observations were reported longer than 1 hr post CT or after IR doses higher than those used in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These genes were chosen mostly from the literature between years 2000 and 2006. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Owing to the wide variety of experimental details (eg, radiation doses, radiation type, in vitro vs. in vivo systems) in the abundance of publications relating to gene expression effects from IR, we focused on review articles that condensed essential information on the effects of IR on various tissue (including hematological) types, which yielded 24 genes that were most likely to exhibit change in blood cells after IR exposure and were linked to cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%