1996
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.1996.00011.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined effects of allelochemical‐fed and scarce prey on the generalist insect predator Podisusmaculiventris

Abstract: 1. The simultaneous effects of allelochemicals ingested by herbivorous insect prey and prey scarcity on the performance of a generalist insect predator were examined. 2. Fifth‐instar predatory stinkbugs (Podisusmaculiventris: Pentatomidae) were fed caterpillars (Manducasexta: Sphingidae) in three prey scarcity treatments: every day (unlimited amount), one caterpillar every third day, one caterpillar every fifth day. The caterpillars were fed either a plain diet or a diet containing rutin, chlorogenic acid and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of allelochemical-containing prey on insect predators may be greater when prey are scarce. For example, allelochemical-fed prey had no adverse effect on growth of an insect predator when prey were plentiful, whereas when prey were scarce, allelochemical-fed prey increased the negative effects of prey scarcity on predator growth (Bozer et al 1996;Weiser and Stamp 1998). The ability to handle plant chemical defenses may reflect the availability of nutrients (Duffey 1980;Slansky and Wheeler 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of allelochemical-containing prey on insect predators may be greater when prey are scarce. For example, allelochemical-fed prey had no adverse effect on growth of an insect predator when prey were plentiful, whereas when prey were scarce, allelochemical-fed prey increased the negative effects of prey scarcity on predator growth (Bozer et al 1996;Weiser and Stamp 1998). The ability to handle plant chemical defenses may reflect the availability of nutrients (Duffey 1980;Slansky and Wheeler 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since predatory bugs can also feed on plants (Stoner, 1970;Moreira et al, 1996Moreira et al, /1997, this behavior can affect their development through the ingestion of deleterious substances from resistant plants (Price et al, 1980;Bozer et al, 1996;Traugott & Stamp, 1997). As a consequence, adult longevity of this bug may be shorter and their fecundity and predation capacity could be lower on resistant plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, prey were plentiful. In another study when M. sexta prey were plentiful, moderate levels of these allelochemicals had no effect on stink bug performance, but when prey were scarce, the allelochemicals reduced stink bug growth rate (Bozer et al 1996). Such results are likely to have consequences for stink bug fitness: amount of food consumed and body size positively influence fecundity of stink bugs (, Wiedenmann and O’Neil 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reported RGR and RCR because these are standard, general measurements of insect performance (Scriber and Slansky 1981, Slansky and Scriber 1985); growth rate is a composite statistic used in fundamental issues of ecology and evolution and consumption rate describes response to prey over time. We reported ECI, or gross efficiency, because it gives insight into underlying physiological mechanisms (Slansky and Scriber 1985) and previously we found strong allelochemical effects on ECI of stink bugs (Bozer et al 1996). A conversion factor to estimate the initial dry mass of the nymphs was determined by weighing 20 newly molted fourth‐instar nymphs and, after drying at 55°C, reweighing them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%