2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined effect of the body mass index and implant size on the wear of retrieved total knee prostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, the preclinical endurance testing should reproduce on the artificial implants the in vivo conditions of load and motion experimented by the human joint in order to assess the wear of prosthetic components and give information about materials and design optimization for prosthetic implants. The research in this field has been going on for many years [3,4] and is still strongly active in order to further increase the service life of TKRs, as evidenced by the many studies [5,6,7]. At the state of the art, two simulation concepts for the knee joint are available and defined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14243-1/3 standards: the force control (FC) and the displacement control (DC) [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the preclinical endurance testing should reproduce on the artificial implants the in vivo conditions of load and motion experimented by the human joint in order to assess the wear of prosthetic components and give information about materials and design optimization for prosthetic implants. The research in this field has been going on for many years [3,4] and is still strongly active in order to further increase the service life of TKRs, as evidenced by the many studies [5,6,7]. At the state of the art, two simulation concepts for the knee joint are available and defined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14243-1/3 standards: the force control (FC) and the displacement control (DC) [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this result means that large-sized prostheses have a 60.7% ({33.1 -20.6}/20.6) superior performance than medium-sized prostheses. Therefore, it has been confirmed that among other factors, e.g., tibial implant thickness [13,14], TKR size also has a significant effect on knee kinematics, or more precisely on the restored rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Whether TKR size has significant role in this performance, has not been further discussed. The effect of implant size has only been focused on a few knee kinematics-related issues, e.g., the individual effect of the tibial implant thickness on the tibiofemoral angle (TFA) [13] or TKR wear [14]. With regard to wear, TKR size has been proven to be a contradictory parameter since the experimental results of Affatato et al [15], demonstrated that under the same condition larger tibial UHMWPE inserts resulted in higher wear ratios than those of the small implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%