Abstract:This work studies the combined effect of resistance spot welding and post-welding sensitization on the pitting corrosion behavior of AISI 304 (UNS S30400) by using cyclic potentiodynamic polarization tests. The combined effect of welding and post-welding sensitization give rise to worse pit nucleation resistances and better repassivation capacities than those of the state without prior welding. This behavior is caused by the weld metal zone, a cast dendritic microstructure with δ-ferrite in interdendritic regi… Show more
“…As it can be observed in Figures 13 and 14, the variation rate of the DOS with post-welding sensitisation time is higher in the FZ than in HAZ and BM. This phenomenon is caused by the fact that the kinetics of microstructural regeneration is faster in FZ than in HAZ and BM [24,65], which may be due to two causes. First, the chemical segregation associated with the solidification processes [66,67], where the last fraction of liquid that solidifies enriches in ferrite-stabilising elements such as chromium, and thus, the interdendritic regions can be expected to be zones for preferential delta-ferrite formation [68,69] (this chemical segregation makes the rate of diffusion higher since concentration gradient is, according to Fick's law, the driving force of diffusion [70]).…”
In resistance spot welding (RSW) joints of austenitic stainless steel (ASS), a small-scale electrochemical cell (minicell) was used for assessing individually, on each of the three welding zones, of size less than 1000 µm (fusion zone (FZ), heat affected zone (HAZ) and base metal (BM)), the combined effect of a RSW process and post-welding sensitisation on the degree of sensitisation (DOS). The results show that the three welding zones have different microstructures that make each of them respond differently to post-welding sensitisation. The DOS varies with post-welding sensitisation time in all three welding zones, but it varies at a different rate in each welding zone (the highest rate in the FZ). This variation is due to the fact that when the DOS reaches a certain level, which is observed when plotting the reactivation charge (Q r ) versus the post-welding sensitisation time, a microstructural regeneration occurs.
“…As it can be observed in Figures 13 and 14, the variation rate of the DOS with post-welding sensitisation time is higher in the FZ than in HAZ and BM. This phenomenon is caused by the fact that the kinetics of microstructural regeneration is faster in FZ than in HAZ and BM [24,65], which may be due to two causes. First, the chemical segregation associated with the solidification processes [66,67], where the last fraction of liquid that solidifies enriches in ferrite-stabilising elements such as chromium, and thus, the interdendritic regions can be expected to be zones for preferential delta-ferrite formation [68,69] (this chemical segregation makes the rate of diffusion higher since concentration gradient is, according to Fick's law, the driving force of diffusion [70]).…”
In resistance spot welding (RSW) joints of austenitic stainless steel (ASS), a small-scale electrochemical cell (minicell) was used for assessing individually, on each of the three welding zones, of size less than 1000 µm (fusion zone (FZ), heat affected zone (HAZ) and base metal (BM)), the combined effect of a RSW process and post-welding sensitisation on the degree of sensitisation (DOS). The results show that the three welding zones have different microstructures that make each of them respond differently to post-welding sensitisation. The DOS varies with post-welding sensitisation time in all three welding zones, but it varies at a different rate in each welding zone (the highest rate in the FZ). This variation is due to the fact that when the DOS reaches a certain level, which is observed when plotting the reactivation charge (Q r ) versus the post-welding sensitisation time, a microstructural regeneration occurs.
“…The literature review reveals that a lot of work has been reported on sensitization phenomenon while RSW of SS [5][6][7][8][9] . Some studies have focused on the combined effect of resistance spot welding and post-welding sensitization on the pitting corrosion behavior of AISI 304 SS 10 . But hitherto no work has been reported as comparative study on the performance of cryogenically treated and non-cryogenically treated welding electrodes for reducing sensitization related problems in RSW of 304SS.…”
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of cryogenic treated electrodes on the sensitization of ‘304 SS’ in resistance spot welding (RSW). An approach to model sensitization based upon the weld properties like: hardness, tensile-shear strength (T-S), while RSW of 304SS has been proposed and applied. Relationship between hardness, T-S and other parameter has been deduced by using Taguchi L9 orthogonal array (OA). The results indicate that for sensitization; coolant flow rate (CFR), weld time and voltage contributes significantly in RSW of SS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.