2015
DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqu190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined effect of back pain and stress on work ability

Abstract: Corporate health promotion interventions to reduce the impact of BP and stress perception on work ability should target both physical and psychological dimensions. Such interventions may be initiated in the context of regular (occupational) medical examinations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
19
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This impact can lead to negative individual consequences at the physical, psychological and behavioral level and can also bring organizational consequences (30,36) . Individual consequences may affect the person at different levels and include: physical symptoms associated with pain (e.g., cramps, headaches), musculoskeletal injuries or disorders, breathing difficulties, allergies, hypertension and cardiovascular disorders, sexual disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, insomnia, immune disorders, embrittlement and fatigue (37) ; as well as psychological symptoms related to depression and stress, nervousness and increased irritability, crying spells/nerves, increased sadness and anxiety, memory loss and exhaustion, difficulty concentrating and making decisions, emotional instability, subjugation or dependence on others, emotional oscillation and depersonalization (2,4) ; and finally, the behavioral symptoms that are manifested as isolation, neglect of personal needs (sleeping, eating, socializing), increased alcohol consumption, self-medication and use of drugs, tobacco and caffeine, interpersonal and family conflicts, aggression, lack of cooperation and indifference, missed work and commitment, errors and failures in performance and, in extreme cases, suicide (5) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This impact can lead to negative individual consequences at the physical, psychological and behavioral level and can also bring organizational consequences (30,36) . Individual consequences may affect the person at different levels and include: physical symptoms associated with pain (e.g., cramps, headaches), musculoskeletal injuries or disorders, breathing difficulties, allergies, hypertension and cardiovascular disorders, sexual disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, insomnia, immune disorders, embrittlement and fatigue (37) ; as well as psychological symptoms related to depression and stress, nervousness and increased irritability, crying spells/nerves, increased sadness and anxiety, memory loss and exhaustion, difficulty concentrating and making decisions, emotional instability, subjugation or dependence on others, emotional oscillation and depersonalization (2,4) ; and finally, the behavioral symptoms that are manifested as isolation, neglect of personal needs (sleeping, eating, socializing), increased alcohol consumption, self-medication and use of drugs, tobacco and caffeine, interpersonal and family conflicts, aggression, lack of cooperation and indifference, missed work and commitment, errors and failures in performance and, in extreme cases, suicide (5) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship is supported by the good functioning of living conditions, a favourable quality of life, increasing productivity and consequently leading to decreased job abandonment at a later age (2) . This was, social and economic costs for the worker and for society are reduced (3,4) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An effect of this policy is to minimize compensation for pain per se, which may be affected by compensation-seeking [8][9][10]. However, the inability of the back to function normally because of pain may relate to factors known to affect pain: mood and type of activities engaged in and other factors, such as incentives [11][12][13]. The extent to which these and other factors relate to service-connection determinations for painful conditions has not been described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En nuestro estudio, agrupando el dolor lumbar y cervical tenemos que el 5.6 % de las personas, sin dolor, tenían un WAI pobre/moderado, frente al 14.6% de las que sí lo tenían. Esto es posible atribuir a las diferencias en el tipo de trabajo de oficina de nuestra población, al trabajo más de naturaleza física y de mayor riesgo como el trabajo en las unidades de cuidados intensivos(29); el cual, también ha sido corroborado en otro estudio de cohorte donde los menores valores de riesgo de enfermedades musculoesqueléticas están en los trabajadores administrativos, también denominados trabajador de cuello blanco, frente a otros grupos ocupacionales como educación , salud y obreros (cuello azul)(21).Por otro lado, un estudio transversal en 653 encuestados en una empresa química ha encontrado una relación entre el dolor lumbar y el WAI, encontrando que las personas que han tenido un dolor lumbar previo tienen un OR 2.21 (IC 95% 1.52-3.22) de tener un nivel de WAI por debajo a 42, estos resultados no se diferencian entre grupos ocupacionales(30).La relación entre WAI y el dolor musculoesquelético en general , el lumbar y cervical en particular también ha sido encontrado en otras poblaciones como agricultores (31) ,…”
unclassified