2012
DOI: 10.14359/51684160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Effect of Aggregate and Mineral Admixtures on Tensile Ductility of Engineered Cementitious Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The weak interfacial transition zone results in a lower compressive strength of the composite (17). Moreover, coarse particle size will lead to balling of fibers and results in increased porosity of mixture, which means poor compressive performance (27). The standard deviations of A_36_87 and A_40_63 are greater than those of both A_88_100 and A_43_99 sand gradation specimens, which may caused by poor fiber dispersion.…”
Section: • 90smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weak interfacial transition zone results in a lower compressive strength of the composite (17). Moreover, coarse particle size will lead to balling of fibers and results in increased porosity of mixture, which means poor compressive performance (27). The standard deviations of A_36_87 and A_40_63 are greater than those of both A_88_100 and A_43_99 sand gradation specimens, which may caused by poor fiber dispersion.…”
Section: • 90smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per the cross validation method, every layer used different nodes (12 to 8). As per literature, a learning rate of 0.001 to 0.009 was kept [21][22][23]. ANN is also recognised to be weight-initializing sensitive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Pandas library, data cleaning and analysis features are applied. A total of 324 and 147 SM concrete mix specimens (Laboratory cast) were checked with various researchers' data for considering compressive strength and split tensile strength, respectively [5][6][7][8][9][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. The available categorical parameters used for the prediction model are noted in Table 1 and non-categorical mention in Table 2.…”
Section: 𝑍 𝑗"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayrıca, bu karışımların 7. ve 28. gündeki maksimum eğilme yükü ve orta noktadaki sehim eğrileri sırasıyla, Şekil 14 ve Şekil 15'de sunulmuştur. [87]. Ayrıca, UK+YFC esaslı EGC karışımlarının deformasyon kapasiteleri, özellikle UK parçacıklarının pürüzsüz küresel şekli ile yüksek hacimde UK içeren ECC karışımının arttırılmış sünekliği arasında bildirilen yakın ilişki ile, FA ikamesi olarak kullanılan YFC parçacıklarının pürüzlü ve köşeli parçacık morfolojisinden de olumsuz etkilenmiş olabilir [88].…”
Section: Eğilme Performansıunclassified