2020 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation (SSIAI) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/ssiai49293.2020.9094614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Detection and Segmentation of Cell Nuclei in Microscopy Images Using Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This algorithm was also able to improve detection accuracy over methods such as Mask R-CNN and a previous network proposed by the authors [37]. Finally, a 3D Unet inspired segmentation network was combined with a small regression-based centroid detection branch and obtained an F1score of 82% in a high nuclei density 3D fluorescent image set, and 93% in a low nuclei density data set [38].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This algorithm was also able to improve detection accuracy over methods such as Mask R-CNN and a previous network proposed by the authors [37]. Finally, a 3D Unet inspired segmentation network was combined with a small regression-based centroid detection branch and obtained an F1score of 82% in a high nuclei density 3D fluorescent image set, and 93% in a low nuclei density data set [38].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although regression-based approaches have proven to be especially strong at cell-detection tasks in 2D images, few attempts have been made in 3D datasets. Additionally, when segmentation and detection approaches have been paired, the detection branches were usually composed of a few convolutional layers at most, and not similar to the highly accurate regression networks used in 2D [37], [38]. In this manuscript we propose a new segmentation-regression approach that can be applied in intact cardiac and brain tissues, which both include irregularly shaped and clustered nuclei.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also suggest improving the adapted MMA algorithm by adding a frame differencing method as a pre-processing step, then exploiting better multi-scale feature selection to improve average F-score with reference to some of the latest models [35]- [44] on object detection and their post-processing schemes [45]. Furthermore, we are investigating some of the recent deep learning schemes [46]- [57] for detecting and tracking vehicles [27], [34], [39], [58]- [61] in accordance with the complexity analysis [45], [62]- [69] from the deep CNN-based multi-object detection and segmentation schemes [48]- [51], [53]- [56], [59]- [61], [64]- [66], [70]- [72] applied to wide-area aerial surveillance.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to various reasons such as fluctuating intensities [4] , color change and morphological variations within structures of the cancer lesions in these images [5] , tumor heterogeneity [6] (see Fig. 1 ), low signal-to-noise-ratio [7] , [8] , variations in illumination [9] , microscopy imaging limitations [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , and the large number of images and the number of lesions per image an expert has to demarcate. Moreover, the task of manual detection of cancer lesions on H&E slides can be subjective, leading to inter-observer variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%