2020 Tenth International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/ipta50016.2020.9286653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Datasets For Breast Cancer Grading Based On Multi-CNN Architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work shows a high accuracy of 94.57% for all three classes. It concluded that the proposed methodology is robust and has high accuracy for detecting breast cancer in women as compared to [20,41]. It means that it can be implemented for real-time applications to reduce the workload and help the doctor diagnose breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work shows a high accuracy of 94.57% for all three classes. It concluded that the proposed methodology is robust and has high accuracy for detecting breast cancer in women as compared to [20,41]. It means that it can be implemented for real-time applications to reduce the workload and help the doctor diagnose breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a study [41], the concept of transfer learning is utilized for training the pre-trained model for the classification of BU images. The ResNet-50 and MobileNet pre-trained models showed 97.03% and 94.42% accuracy and took almost 114.57 and 192.4 min for training, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques, on the other hand, are robust and necessitate a large amount of computer power. Transfer learning, on the other hand, is becoming increasingly common; for example, many studies 26,27 used transfer learning to grade breast cancer. There is a knowledge gap among these research, to our knowledge: there have been no performance comparisons of recent pre-trained state-of-the-art CNN architectures ((EfficientNetB0 28 , EfficientNetV2B0 29 , EfficientNetV2B0-21k 29 , ResNetV1-50 30 , ResNetV2-50 31 , MobileNetV1 32 , and MobileNetV2 33 ).…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of Seven Convolutional Neural Network (...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. To conduct a comparative investigation of the performance of seven selected cutting edge CNN architectures on the Four Breast Cancer Grades (FBCG) Dataset 26 .…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of Seven Convolutional Neural Network (...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, deep learning showed good results in image classification, especially in object detection by the use of the convolutional neural networks (CNNs) architectures which are the leading algorithms in BC classification, [7][8][9] brain tumor segmentation, 10,11 and in many other computer vision tasks. [12][13][14][15][16] Although CNN succeeded in classifying images, they still need more improvement to avoid the overfitting, under-fitting, and the use of the different preprocessing techniques that take the time and the resources in classifying histopathological and microscopic images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%