1997
DOI: 10.3109/14017439709069550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Antegrade-Retrograde Blood Cardioplegia does not Protect Right Ventricle Better than Either Technique Alone in Patients with Occluded Right Coronary Artery

Abstract: To study the hypothesis that combined antegrade-retrograde delivery of cardioplegia might overcome the limitations in myocardial protection of either technique alone, we compared the distribution of the different cardioplegic approaches by assessing myocardial cooling and evaluated the effects on right ventricular (RV) function in elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients with occluded right coronary artery (RCA). In a randomized trial, 15 patients received exclusively antegrade (ante group), 14… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in patients with right coronary stenosis, retrograde cardioplegia was responsible for a reduction of the RVEF. Another randomized trial, including patients with right coronary thrombosis compared three groups of patients, receiving antegrade, retrograde, or combined antegrade–retrograde cold blood cardioplegia 12 . Myocardial cooling was similar in the three groups, and the RVEF decreased postoperatively in all groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, in patients with right coronary stenosis, retrograde cardioplegia was responsible for a reduction of the RVEF. Another randomized trial, including patients with right coronary thrombosis compared three groups of patients, receiving antegrade, retrograde, or combined antegrade–retrograde cold blood cardioplegia 12 . Myocardial cooling was similar in the three groups, and the RVEF decreased postoperatively in all groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitation of this study was the absence of randomization: patients in the ONCAB group were more likely to have a lesion of the circumflex coronary artery and therefore, the number of grafts was higher in this group as the surgical exposure of the circumflex artery during OPCAB is more difficult. Anyhow, postoperative right ventricular dysfunction after ONCAB surgery is not related to the number of grafts 1 but is observed mainly in patients with RCA disease 12,16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadequate RV protection may lead to unexpected low postoperative cardiac output despite good preservation of left ventricular function [54,104]. Current myocardial protective methods do not always offer adequate protection of RV, especially in patients with right coronary artery stenosis, neither antegrade nor retrograde cardioplegia delivery provides adequate protection of the right atrium and ventricle [54,105]. IP can thus be used as an additional protective means in the myocardial protection strategy of combined antegrade and retrograde delivery of cold blood cardioplegia.…”
Section: Cpb Operation With Cardioplegiamentioning
confidence: 98%