2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.112.191801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Analysis ofνμDisappearance andνμνeAppearance in MINOS Using Accelerat

Abstract: Combined analysis of µ disappearance and µ e ν ν → ν appearance in MINOS using accelerator and atmospheric neutrinos Article (Published Version) http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Devenish, N E, Falk, E, Hartnell, J and The MINOS Collaboration, et al (2014) Combined analysis of νμ disappearance and νμ → νe appearance in MINOS using accelerator and atmospheric neutrinos. Physical Review Letters (PRL), 112 (19). This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/70068/ This document is made… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
167
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
17
167
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results for the inverted hierarchy are similar (up to ∆m 2 32 approximately changing sign). These are consistent with results from MINOS [46], NOνA [48], and atmospheric neutrino data [37]. While analyzing simulated data from DUNE or Hyper-K, we will not include any prior information on ∆m 2 32 and sin 2 θ 23 since these are expected to be better constrained by DUNE and Hyper-K independently.…”
Section: Neutrino Parameter Measurementssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results for the inverted hierarchy are similar (up to ∆m 2 32 approximately changing sign). These are consistent with results from MINOS [46], NOνA [48], and atmospheric neutrino data [37]. While analyzing simulated data from DUNE or Hyper-K, we will not include any prior information on ∆m 2 32 and sin 2 θ 23 since these are expected to be better constrained by DUNE and Hyper-K independently.…”
Section: Neutrino Parameter Measurementssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Neutrino oscillation parameters are mostly constrained by solar neutrino experiments [40][41][42][43][44][45], the SuperKamiokande atmospheric neutrino data [37], and accelerator data from MINOS [46], T2K [47], and the NuMI Off-Axis ν e Appearance Experiment (NOνA) [48]. These imply the existence of two hierarchical mass-squared differences ∆m 2 21 and ∆m 2 32 and three nonzero mixing angles θ 13 , θ 12 , θ 23 .…”
Section: Neutrino Parameter Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LBL Acc. + Solar + KL data Concerning LBL accelerator data, we include the observed energy spectra of events, in both appearance (muonto-electron flavor) and disappearance (muon-to-muon flavor) oscillation modes, as presented by the T2K [17][18][19] and MINOS [20][21][22][23] experiments. The theoretical spectra are calculated through a suitably modified version of the GLoBES software package [24,25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of experimental results on neutrino flavor oscillations converge towards a simple three-neutrino (3ν) framework, where the flavor states ν α = (ν e , ν µ , ν τ ) mix with the massive states ν i = (ν 1 , ν 3 , ν 3 ) via three mixing angles (θ 12 , θ 13 , θ 23 ) and a possible CP-violating phase δ [1]. The observed oscillation frequencies are governed by two independent differences between the squared masses m 2 )/2, where ∆m 2 > 0 and < 0 correspond to normal hierarchy (NH) and inverted hierarchy (IH), respectively [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%