2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.93.115016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined analysis of effective Higgs portal dark matter models

Abstract: We combine and extend the analyses of effective scalar, vector, Majorana and Dirac fermion Higgs portal models of dark matter (DM), in which DM couples to the Standard Model (SM) Higgs boson via an operator of the form O DM H † H. For the fermion models,we take an admixture of scalar ψψ and pseudoscalar ψiγ 5 ψ interaction terms. For each model, we apply constraints on the parameter space based on the Planck measured DM relic density and the LHC limits on the Higgs invisible branching ratio. For the first time… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
123
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
3
123
1
Order By: Relevance
“…a part of the parameter space spanned by the fermion mass M ψ and the Higgs-portal couplingλ hψ , see, e.g., [11]. In the effective field theory setting, the mass and the portal coupling are independent free parameters.…”
Section: Jhep08(2018)147mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a part of the parameter space spanned by the fermion mass M ψ and the Higgs-portal couplingλ hψ , see, e.g., [11]. In the effective field theory setting, the mass and the portal coupling are independent free parameters.…”
Section: Jhep08(2018)147mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also apply the constraint λ hS < 10, as larger values would violate perturbative unitarity and are therefore not physically interesting. More details on the model can be found in accompanying and earlier papers [29,35,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62]. Here our test function consists of the same likelihood components as in Ref.…”
Section: Scanner Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…essentially the one of a Higgs-portal Majorana DM. By adapting the results of [15], by means of the replacement…”
Section: Jhep07(2017)047mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the results of [15] give 55 GeV < m N < 62.5 GeV and ξ 0.14 × q 10 m ψ 100 GeV × c res , (3.11) where c res varies between 1 (for m N 55 GeV) and 0.2 (for m N 62 GeV). Finally, this scenario also works near the S 1 resonances, i.e.…”
Section: Jhep07(2017)047mentioning
confidence: 99%