2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined adsorption–permeation membrane process for the removal of chromium (III) ions from contaminated water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Faujasite zeolite-based RO membrane rejects more than 95% Cr, and as hydrophilic, it maintains a high flux (Covarrubias et al 2008). A combined adsorption-permeation UF membrane process can also remove Cr from aqueous solution (Pagana et al 2011). Emulsion liquid membrane (ELM) was observed as a very effective process of removing Cr(VI) ions successfully from various aqueous solutions (Saravanan and Begum 2006).…”
Section: Membrane Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faujasite zeolite-based RO membrane rejects more than 95% Cr, and as hydrophilic, it maintains a high flux (Covarrubias et al 2008). A combined adsorption-permeation UF membrane process can also remove Cr from aqueous solution (Pagana et al 2011). Emulsion liquid membrane (ELM) was observed as a very effective process of removing Cr(VI) ions successfully from various aqueous solutions (Saravanan and Begum 2006).…”
Section: Membrane Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many different methods of separation of chromium from wastewater [3,4,7]. However, traditional methods used for purification of aqueous solutions containing chromium e.g., precipitation method, ion exchange, adsorption, crystallization, or liquid extraction, are often inefficient and expensive, particularly in the case of the purification of the effluent containing very low chromium concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PZC measurement of the composite membrane was performed at various pH (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) and the obtained result is illustrated in Fig. 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%