2018
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2017.2697209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Active Flux and High-Frequency Injection Methods for Sensorless Direct-Flux Vector Control of Synchronous Reluctance Machines

Abstract: This paper proposes a sensorless control scheme for synchronous reluctance (SyR) motor drives based on the direct-flux vector control (DFVC) method. The control operates in stator-fluxoriented coordinates, using constant switching frequency. A hybrid position and speed observer is proposed, based on the combination of the active flux concept and high-frequency signal injection and demodulation. The two methods are fused together to form a unique position and speed estimate signals, with seamless transition bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
51
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is based on the salient pole effect of the motor, which is mainly used in zero and low speed domains. The second one is called back EMF based methods [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], which utilizes the estimated back EMF signals to obtain the position information of the motor. Because the magnitude of back EMF is in proportion to the speed of the motor, the performance of back EMF based methods at ultra-low and zero speed is extremely poor [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method is based on the salient pole effect of the motor, which is mainly used in zero and low speed domains. The second one is called back EMF based methods [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], which utilizes the estimated back EMF signals to obtain the position information of the motor. Because the magnitude of back EMF is in proportion to the speed of the motor, the performance of back EMF based methods at ultra-low and zero speed is extremely poor [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the magnitude of back EMF is in proportion to the speed of the motor, the performance of back EMF based methods at ultra-low and zero speed is extremely poor [11]. Hence, back EMF based methods and signal injection methods are usually combined to achieve sensorless control for a whole speed range [12][13][14]. Back EMF based methods primarily includes the model adaptive method (MRAS) [16], the Kalman filtering method (EKF) [17], and the sliding mode observer (SMO) [2,18,19], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the application requires sustained operation at very low speeds in a loaded condition, the observer should be combined with a signal-injection scheme, cf. [2]- [4], [15]- [17], [19]- [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are classified into two main categories: category 1, model based techniques: Artificial intelligence techniques [1], nonlinear observers [2], MRAS [3] methods. category 2, saliency based techniques by injected a HF signal [4], [5]. In this paper, category 2 is considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%