2002
DOI: 10.1090/mmono/213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combinatorics of Nonnegative Matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scattering amplitudes for bosons instead involve the permanent [42,72,73], a complex-valued function of matrices similar to the determinant, but that does not feature equivalent symmetry properties. The number of effective parameters for bosons is therefore larger than for fermions.…”
Section: A Fermionic and Bosonic Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scattering amplitudes for bosons instead involve the permanent [42,72,73], a complex-valued function of matrices similar to the determinant, but that does not feature equivalent symmetry properties. The number of effective parameters for bosons is therefore larger than for fermions.…”
Section: A Fermionic and Bosonic Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….} has been studied extensively; see, for example, Brualdi and Ryser (1991), Sachkov and Tarakanov (2002). Next, we use the Boolean operators AND and OR to examine the sequence of powers of A and infer results about the conjunctive Boolean network that corresponds to the adjacency matrix A.…”
Section: The Adjacency Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obvious, that Q n  B n . About the necessary definitions and denotes in the theory of matrices we refer to [7] and [10]. It is not difficult to see, that (1) If A = (a i j )  B n , then A = (a j i ) , 1  i, j  n denotes the transposed matrix A .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%