1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19981012)400:1<35::aid-cne3>3.0.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combinatorial odor discrimination in the brain: Attractive and antagonist odor blends are represented in distinct combinations of uniquely identifiable glomeruli

Abstract: The rules governing the central discrimination of odors are complex and poorly understood, but a growing body of evidence supports the hypothesis that olfactory glomeruli may represent functionally distinct coding modules in the brain. Testing this hypothesis requires that both the functional characteristics and the spatial position of the glomerulus under study be uniquely identifiable. To address these questions, we examined a specialized array of glomeruli (the macroglomerular complex; MGC) in the antennal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
81
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the information about the two principal pheromone components are kept mainly separated along the mALT via two physiologically distinct neuron categories, as shown here and in several previous studies on heliothine moths (Vickers et al, 1998; Vickers and Christensen, 2003; Zhao and Berg, 2010), justifies a short comment. The purpose of keeping the general pheromone information segregated from the inter-specific signal information at this level seems obvious, based on the opposite behavioral responses induced by the different signals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The fact that the information about the two principal pheromone components are kept mainly separated along the mALT via two physiologically distinct neuron categories, as shown here and in several previous studies on heliothine moths (Vickers et al, 1998; Vickers and Christensen, 2003; Zhao and Berg, 2010), justifies a short comment. The purpose of keeping the general pheromone information segregated from the inter-specific signal information at this level seems obvious, based on the opposite behavioral responses induced by the different signals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In addition, competitive blocking on the receptors has been ruled out by adding the “inhibiting” compounds to the pheromones. Furthermore, a separation of the pheromone and the interspecific signal information has been well documented in several species, including the two heliothine species investigated here, both as concerns input to and output from the MGC (Christensen et al, 1995; Hansson et al, 1995; Berg et al, 1998, 2005; Vickers et al, 1998; Zhao and Berg, 2010). Thus, the next relevant question was whether the separation is kept in the lateral horn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations