2008
DOI: 10.1080/09720529.2008.10698186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combinatorial design for a conference: constructing a balanced three-parallel session schedule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work uses a greedy scheduling algorithm, but no empirical results or computational analysis are presented. Ibrahim, Ramli & Hassan (2008) focus on assigning talks to time slots across a number of days in 3 concurrent sessions. Each talk belongs to a field or topic and the goal is avoid scheduling talks of the same topic concurrently.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work uses a greedy scheduling algorithm, but no empirical results or computational analysis are presented. Ibrahim, Ramli & Hassan (2008) focus on assigning talks to time slots across a number of days in 3 concurrent sessions. Each talk belongs to a field or topic and the goal is avoid scheduling talks of the same topic concurrently.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most popularity predictions based on this input turned out to be accurate during the actual conference. Ibrahim et al (2008) focus on a conference scheduling problem where talks need to be assigned to time slots (spread over a number of days) in 3 parallel tracks. Each talk belongs to a field, and the schedule should be such that talks of the same field do not occur simultaneously.…”
Section: Attender-based Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As no individual participant preferences were available, the authors have randomly generated this data from historical attendance data, for various choices of the standard deviation of the number of preferred talks per participant. Notice that the issue of grouping talks into sessions is not included in this problem, in fact, as in Ibrahim et al (2008), each talk could be seen as a session.…”
Section: Attender-based Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature, it shows that the research trend for conference scheduling is moving into generating a schedule that is based on participants' preferences [1][2][3][14][15][16]. Many approaches and methods have been used to improve the quality of the conference schedule, such as using goal programming [1], bi-criterion approach [2] that were inspired from Sampson's PBCS [3], integer programming [16], granular processing and Domain Transformation Approach (DTA) [17][18] and many more.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches and methods have been used to improve the quality of the conference schedule, such as using goal programming [1], bi-criterion approach [2] that were inspired from Sampson's PBCS [3], integer programming [16], granular processing and Domain Transformation Approach (DTA) [17][18] and many more. It was reported that these methods produced very encouraging results.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%