2003
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.49.11.1485.20585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combinatorial Auction Design

Abstract: Combinatorial auctions have two features that greatly affect their design: computational complexity of winner determination and opportunities for cooperation among competitors. Dealing with these forces trade-offs between desirable auction properties such as allocative efficiency, revenue maximization, low transaction costs, fairness, failure freeness, and scalability. Computational complexity can be dealt with algorithmically by relegating the computational burden to bidders, by maintaining fairness in the fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this rule might introduce an incentive for the carriers towards undesired strategicbidding behavior (a similar issue would arise with a set partitioning formulation). As this paper does not focus on auction-mechanism design (compare, e.g., Pekeč andRothkopf 2003 or Chu 2009), we leave this issue to forthcoming research.…”
Section: The Bi-objective Winner Determination Problem For Combinatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this rule might introduce an incentive for the carriers towards undesired strategicbidding behavior (a similar issue would arise with a set partitioning formulation). As this paper does not focus on auction-mechanism design (compare, e.g., Pekeč andRothkopf 2003 or Chu 2009), we leave this issue to forthcoming research.…”
Section: The Bi-objective Winner Determination Problem For Combinatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dealing with these two features forces trade-offs between desirable auction properties such as allocative efficiency, revenue maximization, low transaction costs, fairness, failure freeness, and scalability. Computational complexity can be dealt with algorithmically by relegating the computational burden to bidders, by maintaining fairness in the face of computational limitations, and by limiting biddable combinations and the use of combinatorial bids (Pekec and Rothkopf, 2003). Zeng, Cox and Dror (2007) argue that the single seller combinatorial auctions apply only to very specialized items.…”
Section: Competition With Complementarities and Substitutesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(For recent reviews see [99,336,419].) Allowing bidders to submit "all-or-nothing" bids for combinations of goods yields NP-complete allocation problems that need to be solved efficiently in designing an auction [368].…”
Section: Computational Issues In Auction Design 20mentioning
confidence: 99%