2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of techniques to quantify the distribution of bacteria in their soil microhabitats at different spatial scales

Abstract: To address a number of issues of great societal concern at the moment, like the sequestration of carbon, information is direly needed about interactions between soil architecture and microbial dynamics. Unfortunately, soils are extremely complex, heterogeneous systems comprising highly variable and dynamic micro-habitats that have significant impacts on the growth and activity of inhabiting microbiota. Data remain scarce on the influence of soil physical parameters characterizing the pore space on the distribu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated spatial patterns in organic matter decomposition are in alignment with experimentally observed patterns of extracellular enzyme activity (Kravchenko et al, 2019). Experimental evidence further suggests that C turnover is strongly determined by pore characteristics (Kravchenko and Guber, 2017;Juyal et al, 2019) and microbial activity is highest in pores between 10 and 300 µm (Kravchenko et al, 2019). Thus, an improved description of microbial C turnover could be gained by integrating realistic descriptions of soil pore structure based on X-ray computed tomography data (see e.g., Portell et al, 2018) in combination with a meaningful correlation structure of substrate and microbial group distribution using evidence-based spatial statistical modeling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simulated spatial patterns in organic matter decomposition are in alignment with experimentally observed patterns of extracellular enzyme activity (Kravchenko et al, 2019). Experimental evidence further suggests that C turnover is strongly determined by pore characteristics (Kravchenko and Guber, 2017;Juyal et al, 2019) and microbial activity is highest in pores between 10 and 300 µm (Kravchenko et al, 2019). Thus, an improved description of microbial C turnover could be gained by integrating realistic descriptions of soil pore structure based on X-ray computed tomography data (see e.g., Portell et al, 2018) in combination with a meaningful correlation structure of substrate and microbial group distribution using evidence-based spatial statistical modeling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…All parameters were related to the µm-scale. The mean initial density of microbial cells was set to 20 cells mm −2 (close to the lower limit observed by Raynaud and Nunan, 2014;and Juyal et al, 2019). This is equivalent to an average intensity of the…”
Section: Initialization and Scenario Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aside from the excessive reliance of soil microbiologists in recent years on metagenomics techniques, which do not require any knowledge of the spatial configuration of soil biomass, a key reason very few people have been talking about soil biofilms in these systems, is simply because experimental evidence that biofilms exist in real soils is virtually non-existent. Starting in the 50s, and especially after the advent of transmission or scanning electron microscopes, as well as, later, of laser scanning microscopes, various soil scientists have accumulated a wealth of visual information about the spatial distribution of bacteria and archaea in soils (e.g., Clark, 1951;Jones and Griffiths, 1964;White et al, 1994;DeLeo et al, 1997;Nunan et al, 2001;Li et al, 2003Li et al, , 2004Eickhorst and Tipköttter, 2008;Raynaud and Nunan, 2014;Watteau et al, 2018;Juyal et al, 2019), including at the interfaces between soil and plant roots (e.g., Danhorn and Fuqua, 2007;Cardinale, 2014;Schmidt et al, 2018). None of the micrographs that were produced with these tools show anything that even vaguely looks like a film, patchy or not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a combination of X-ray µCT, fluorescence microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and nanoSIMS, these authors are able to study the distribution of bacteria in a soil, and to show that they have a preference toward foraging near macropore surfaces and near fresh particulate organic matter. Juyal et al (2019) combined X-ray CT with biological thin sections to elucidate the impact of pore architecture on bacterial distribution in soil. They highlighted that when different methods are being integrated, one needs to consider an "appropriate spatial scale" to understand the factors that regulate the distribution of microbial communities in soils.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%